[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lib32 followup (visibility issue and/or toolchain bug?)
- To: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:30:05 +0100
- Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
- Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:30:18 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Hello,
Preempting some future work I'm expecting to arrive, I had a go at using
__builtin_*() in obj32.
This is formed of 2 patches on top of this series:
https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/andrewcoop/xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/xen-lib32
Patch 1 introduces lib32 beside obj32, with strlen() being the first
broken-out function, and patch 2 swaps to __builtin_strlen().
Both compile, but the difference that patch 2 introduces was unexpected.
With just lib32, and taking strsubcmp() as an example, we get:
00000000 <strsubcmp>:
0: 83 ec 0c sub $0xc,%esp
3: 89 5c 24 04 mov %ebx,0x4(%esp)
7: 89 74 24 08 mov %esi,0x8(%esp)
b: 89 c6 mov %eax,%esi
d: 89 d3 mov %edx,%ebx
f: 89 d0 mov %edx,%eax
11: /-- e8 fc ff ff ff call 12 <strsubcmp+0x12>
12: R_386_PC32 strlen
16: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx
18: 89 da mov %ebx,%edx
1a: 89 f0 mov %esi,%eax
1c: /-- e8 fc ff ff ff call 1d <strsubcmp+0x1d>
1d: R_386_PC32 .text.strncmp
21: 8b 5c 24 04 mov 0x4(%esp),%ebx
25: 8b 74 24 08 mov 0x8(%esp),%esi
29: 83 c4 0c add $0xc,%esp
2c: c3 ret
which all seems fine. We get a plain PC32 relocation to strlen (which
is now in the separate library).
However, with patch 2 in place (simply swapping the plain extern for
__builtin_strlen(), we now get:
00000000 <strsubcmp>:
0: 83 ec 0c sub $0xc,%esp
3: 89 1c 24 mov %ebx,(%esp)
6: 89 74 24 04 mov %esi,0x4(%esp)
a: 89 7c 24 08 mov %edi,0x8(%esp)
e: /-- e8 fc ff ff ff call f <strsubcmp+0xf>
f: R_386_PC32 __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx
13: 81 c3 02 00 00 00 add $0x2,%ebx
15: R_386_GOTPC _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
19: 89 c7 mov %eax,%edi
1b: 89 d6 mov %edx,%esi
1d: 89 d0 mov %edx,%eax
1f: /-- e8 fc ff ff ff call 20 <strsubcmp+0x20>
20: R_386_PLT32 strlen
24: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx
26: 89 f2 mov %esi,%edx
28: 89 f8 mov %edi,%eax
2a: /-- e8 fc ff ff ff call 2b <strsubcmp+0x2b>
2b: R_386_PC32 .text.strncmp
2f: 8b 1c 24 mov (%esp),%ebx
32: 8b 74 24 04 mov 0x4(%esp),%esi
36: 8b 7c 24 08 mov 0x8(%esp),%edi
3a: 83 c4 0c add $0xc,%esp
3d: c3 ret
The builtin hasn't managed to optimise away the call to strlen (that's
fine). But, we've ended up spilling %ebx to the stack, calculating the
location of the GOT and not using it.
So, as it stands, trying to use __builtin_strlen() results in worse code
generation. One thing I noticed was that we're not passing
-fvisibility=hidden into CFLAGS_x86_32, but fixing that doesn't help
either. We do have the pragma from compiler.h, so I'm out of visibility
ideas.
Anything else I've missed?
~Andrew
|