[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 02/38] x86/boot: convert consider_modules to struct boot_module


  • To: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:29:02 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx, christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:29:09 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 21/10/2024 10:53 am, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 21/10/2024 1:45 am, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> To start transitioning consider_modules() over to struct boot_module, begin
>> with taking the array of struct boot_modules but use the temporary struct
>> element mod.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Smith <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
> I've taken patch 1 (currently in testing to push).
>
> However, this change breaks PV Shim (same test case that I debugged the
> OSSTest failure with on Saturday).
>
> (XEN) PVH start info: (pa 0000ffc0)
> (XEN)   version:    1
> (XEN)   flags:      0
> (XEN)   nr_modules: 2
> (XEN)   modlist_pa: 000000000000ff60
> (XEN)   cmdline_pa: 000000000000ffa0
> (XEN)   cmdline:    'pv-shim console=xen,pv'
> (XEN)   rsdp_pa:    00000000fc008000
> (XEN)     mod[0].pa:         0000000001042000
> (XEN)     mod[0].size:       0000000006907440
> (XEN)     mod[0].cmdline_pa: 0000000000000000
> (XEN)     mod[1].pa:         00000000016d9000
> (XEN)     mod[1].size:       0000000019870751
> (XEN)     mod[1].cmdline_pa: 0000000000000000
> (XEN) Bootloader: PVH Directboot
> (XEN) Command line: pv-shim console=xen,pv
> (XEN) Xen image load base address: 0
> ...
> (XEN) ----[ Xen-4.20-unstable  x86_64  debug=y ubsan=y  Not tainted ]----
> (XEN) CPU:    0
> (XEN) RIP:    e008:[<ffff82d040a51d38>]
> arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c#dom0_construct+0x2020/0x24eb
> ...
> (XEN) Xen call trace:
> (XEN)    [<ffff82d040a51d38>] R
> arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c#dom0_construct+0x2020/0x24eb
> (XEN)    [<ffff82d040a52222>] F dom0_construct_pv+0x1f/0xcd
> (XEN)    [<ffff82d040a7bb27>] F construct_dom0+0xad/0xc0
> (XEN)    [<ffff82d040a6eb3f>] F __start_xen+0x50f2/0x53aa
> (XEN)    [<ffff82d040206184>] F __high_start+0x94/0xa0
> ...
> (XEN) Pagetable walk from ffff8287fffffff8:
> (XEN)  L4[0x105] = 000000001fa17063 ffffffffffffffff
> (XEN)  L3[0x01f] = 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff
> (XEN)
> (XEN) ****************************************
> (XEN) Panic on CPU 0:
> (XEN) FATAL PAGE FAULT
> (XEN) [error_code=0000]
> (XEN) Faulting linear address: ffff8287fffffff8
> (XEN) ****************************************
>
> We've got a wild access, but it's not clear exactly what's going on here.
>
> addr2line says it's line 904 which is in the middle of the
> page_list_for_each() loop setting up the physmap.
>
> My gut feeling is that the pointer -> array conversion in
> consider_modules() isn't correct, because that's literally the only
> non-trivial change, but I can't spot anything concretely wrong...

To follow up, this isn't really the fault of this patch.

It's a hindenbug left by prior patches.  Fix at
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20241022124114.84498-1-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.