|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/boot: Uses nm command instead of map file to get symbols
On 06/11/2024 11:41 am, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Map file format is not standard making it code readind it
> not portable and potentially hard to maintain.
I think you want to include a sentence along the lines of
"combine_two_binaries.py only understands GNU LD's format, and does not
work with LLVM's LLD."
That makes it more clear why this this gets a Fixes tag.
I'd also suggest having the following sentence in separate paragraph for
clarity.
> Use nm command instead to get list of symbols; specifically
> BSD format as it does not truncate symbols names like sysv one.
>
> Fixes: aa9045e77130 ('x86/boot: Rework how 32bit C is linked/included for
> early boot')
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.ziglio@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile | 5 +++--
> xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile b/xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile
> index 777b4befeb..01100a4b72 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/Makefile
> @@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ $(obj)/built-in-32.tmp.o: $(obj32)
> # If possible we use --orphan-handling=error option to make sure we account
> # for all possible sections from C code.
> $(obj)/built-in-32.%.bin: $(obj)/build32.%.lds $(obj)/built-in-32.tmp.o
> - $(LD32) $(orphan-handling-y) -N -T $< -Map $(@:bin=map) -o $(@:bin=o)
> $(filter %.o,$^)
> + $(LD32) $(orphan-handling-y) -N -T $< -o $(@:bin=o) $(filter %.o,$^)
> + $(NM) -p --format=bsd $(@:bin=o) > $(@:bin=nm)
> $(OBJCOPY) -j .text -O binary $(@:bin=o) $@
> rm -f $(@:bin=o)
>
> @@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ cmd_combine = \
> --script $(obj)/build32.base.lds \
> --bin1 $(obj)/built-in-32.base.bin \
> --bin2 $(obj)/built-in-32.offset.bin \
> - --map $(obj)/built-in-32.base.map \
> + --symbols $(obj)/built-in-32.base.nm \
> --exports cmdline_parse_early,reloc,reloc_trampoline32 \
> --output $@
>
> diff --git a/xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py
> b/xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py
> index 447c0d3bdb..db02494b28 100755
> --- a/xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py
> +++ b/xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py
> @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ parser.add_argument('--text-diff', dest='text_diff',
> help='Difference between code section start')
> parser.add_argument('--output', dest='output',
> help='Output file')
> -parser.add_argument('--map', dest='mapfile',
> - help='Map file to read for symbols to export')
> +parser.add_argument('--symbols', dest='symbols_file',
> + help='Nm command output to read for symbols to export')
We call the output of $(NM) uniformly .map elsewhere in Xen, even the
top level System.map
I'd suggest retaining the .map extension, and --map argument, and you
can probably just say help='Map file (NM) to ...' for the help text to
make it explicit.
That in turn reduces the churn ...
> parser.add_argument('--exports', dest='exports',
> help='Symbols to export')
> parser.add_argument('--section-header', dest='section_header',
> @@ -65,15 +65,23 @@ exports = []
> if args.exports is not None:
> exports = dict([(name, None) for name in args.exports.split(',')])
>
> -# Parse mapfile, look for ther symbols we want to export.
> -if args.mapfile is not None:
> - symbol_re = re.compile(r'\s{15,}0x([0-9a-f]+)\s+(\S+)\n')
> - for line in open(args.mapfile):
> - m = symbol_re.match(line)
> - if not m or m.group(2) not in exports:
> +# Parse symbols file, look for symbols we want to export.
> +if args.symbols_file is not None:
... here.
> + dummy_start = -1
> + for line in open(args.symbols_file):
> + v = line.split()
> + if len(v) != 3 or v[1].upper() != 'T':
> continue
A slightly nicer way of doing this is:
parts = line.split()
if len(parts) != 3:
continue
addr, type, sym = parts
which means you have more legible code blow.
> - addr = int(m.group(1), 16)
> - exports[m.group(2)] = addr
> + addr = int(v[0], 16)
> + if v[2] == 'dummy_start':
> + dummy_start = addr
> + continue
> + if v[2] not in exports:
> + continue
> + exports[v[2]] = addr
> + if dummy_start != 0:
> + raise Exception("dummy_start symbol expected to be present and 0")
> +
> for (name, addr) in exports.items():
> if addr is None:
> raise Exception("Required export symbols %s not found" % name)
Something to consider. Instead of special casing dummy_start in several
ways, you could, insert it into exports to begin with, then check
if exports["dummy_start"] != 0:
raise Exception("dummy_start symbol expected to be present and 0")
del exports["dummy_start"]
after which you're back to just the real --exports in exports[].
All of this said, it definitely looks like a much more robust solution
to the problem.
~Andrew
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |