[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH v8 1/3] xen/pci: introduce PF<->VF links
Add links between a VF's struct pci_dev and its associated PF struct pci_dev. The hardware domain is expected to remove the associated VFs before removing the PF. If removal happens out of order, print a warning and return an error. This means that VFs can only exist with an associated PF. Additionally, if the hardware domain attempts to remove a PF with VFs still present, mark the PF and VFs broken, because Linux Dom0 has been observed to not respect the error returned. Move the calls to pci_get_pdev() and pci_add_device() down to avoid dropping and re-acquiring the pcidevs_lock(). Check !pdev->pf_pdev before adding the VF to the list to guard against adding it multiple times. Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx> --- Candidate for backport to 4.19 (the next patch depends on this one) v7->v8: * re-add logic catering to adding VFs without PF for backporting (split removal to separate patch) * move & reword comment about is_extfn * check pdev->pf_pdev to guard against multiple list addition * re-indent pf_pdev initialization v6->v7: * cope with multiple invocations of pci_add_device for VFs * get rid of enclosing struct for single member * during PF removal attempt with VFs still present: * keep PF * mark broken * don't unlink * return error * during VF add: * initialize pf_pdev in declaration * remove logic catering to adding VFs without PF v5->v6: * move printk() before ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() * warn about PF removal with VFs still present * clarify commit message v4->v5: * new patch, split from ("x86/msi: fix locking for SR-IOV devices") * move INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vf_list); earlier * collapse struct list_head instances * retain error code from pci_add_device() * unlink (and mark broken) VFs instead of removing them * const-ify VF->PF link --- xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- xen/include/xen/pci.h | 8 ++++ 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c index 74d3895e1ef6..3fe2e7884f45 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ static struct pci_dev *alloc_pdev(struct pci_seg *pseg, u8 bus, u8 devfn) *((u8*) &pdev->devfn) = devfn; pdev->domain = NULL; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vf_list); + arch_pci_init_pdev(pdev); rc = pdev_msi_init(pdev); @@ -449,6 +451,10 @@ static void free_pdev(struct pci_seg *pseg, struct pci_dev *pdev) list_del(&pdev->alldevs_list); pdev_msi_deinit(pdev); + + if ( pdev->info.is_virtfn ) + list_del(&pdev->vf_list); + xfree(pdev); } @@ -656,24 +662,11 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn, unsigned int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn), func = PCI_FUNC(devfn); const char *type; int ret; - bool pf_is_extfn = false; if ( !info ) type = "device"; else if ( info->is_virtfn ) - { - pcidevs_lock(); - pdev = pci_get_pdev(NULL, - PCI_SBDF(seg, info->physfn.bus, - info->physfn.devfn)); - if ( pdev ) - pf_is_extfn = pdev->info.is_extfn; - pcidevs_unlock(); - if ( !pdev ) - pci_add_device(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn, - NULL, node); type = "virtual function"; - } else if ( info->is_extfn ) type = "extended function"; else @@ -698,12 +691,48 @@ int pci_add_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn, if ( info ) { pdev->info = *info; - /* - * VF's 'is_extfn' field is used to indicate whether its PF is an - * extended function. - */ if ( pdev->info.is_virtfn ) - pdev->info.is_extfn = pf_is_extfn; + { + struct pci_dev *pf_pdev = + pci_get_pdev(NULL, PCI_SBDF(seg, info->physfn.bus, + info->physfn.devfn)); + + if ( !pf_pdev ) + { + ret = pci_add_device(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn, + NULL, node); + if ( ret ) + { + printk(XENLOG_WARNING + "Failed to add SR-IOV device PF %pp for VF %pp\n", + &PCI_SBDF(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn), + &pdev->sbdf); + free_pdev(pseg, pdev); + goto out; + } + pf_pdev = pci_get_pdev(NULL, PCI_SBDF(seg, info->physfn.bus, + info->physfn.devfn)); + if ( !pf_pdev ) + { + printk(XENLOG_ERR + "Inconsistent PCI state: failed to find newly added PF %pp for VF %pp\n", + &PCI_SBDF(seg, info->physfn.bus, info->physfn.devfn), + &pdev->sbdf); + ASSERT_UNREACHABLE(); + free_pdev(pseg, pdev); + ret = -EILSEQ; + goto out; + } + } + + if ( !pdev->pf_pdev ) + { + /* VF inherits its 'is_extfn' from PF */ + pdev->info.is_extfn = pf_pdev->info.is_extfn; + list_add(&pdev->vf_list, &pf_pdev->vf_list); + pdev->pf_pdev = pf_pdev; + } + } } if ( !pdev->info.is_virtfn && !pdev->vf_rlen[0] ) @@ -821,6 +850,28 @@ int pci_remove_device(u16 seg, u8 bus, u8 devfn) list_for_each_entry ( pdev, &pseg->alldevs_list, alldevs_list ) if ( pdev->bus == bus && pdev->devfn == devfn ) { + if ( !pdev->info.is_virtfn && !list_empty(&pdev->vf_list) ) + { + struct pci_dev *vf_pdev; + + /* + * Linux Dom0 has been observed to not respect an error code + * returned from PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove. Mark VFs and PF + * broken. + */ + list_for_each_entry(vf_pdev, &pdev->vf_list, vf_list) + vf_pdev->broken = true; + + pdev->broken = true; + + printk(XENLOG_WARNING + "Attempted to remove PCI SR-IOV PF %pp with VFs still present\n", + &pdev->sbdf); + + ret = -EBUSY; + break; + } + if ( pdev->domain ) { write_lock(&pdev->domain->pci_lock); diff --git a/xen/include/xen/pci.h b/xen/include/xen/pci.h index 1e4fe68c60fb..977c0d08f78a 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/pci.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/pci.h @@ -153,7 +153,15 @@ struct pci_dev { unsigned int count; #define PT_FAULT_THRESHOLD 10 } fault; + + /* + * List head if PF. + * List entry if VF. + */ + struct list_head vf_list; u64 vf_rlen[6]; + /* Link from VF to PF. Only populated for VFs. */ + const struct pci_dev *pf_pdev; /* Data for vPCI. */ struct vpci *vpci; -- 2.47.0
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |