[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/hyperlaunch: locate dom0 kernel with hyperlaunch


  • To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 07:36:36 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx, christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 06:36:46 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 30.01.2025 22:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 26.12.2024 17:57, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>>> Look for a subnode of type `multiboot,kernel` within a domain node. If 
>>> found,
>>> process the reg property for the MB1 module index. If the bootargs property 
>>> is
>>> present and there was not an MB1 string, then use the command line from the
>>> device tree definition.
>>
>> While multiboot is apparently the first x86-specific part (as far as Xen 
>> goes)
>> to be put under domain-builder/, I wonder:
>> - Wouldn't looking for "multiboot,kernel" simply yield nothing on non-x86,
>>   so having the code under common/ would still be okay?
> 
> One small clarification: multiboot,kernel is actually common between
> both ARM and x86. It is "module-index" which is x86-specific and would
> "simply yield nothing on non-x86", as you wrote.
> 
> I'll let Dan address your point that "having the code under common/
> would still be okay".
> 
> 
>> - What's "multiboot" describing here? The origin of the module? (What other
>>   origins would then be possible? How would MB1 and MB2 be distinguished?
>>   What about a native xen.efi boot?) A property of the kernel (when Linux
>>   doesn't use MB)?
> 
> Each device tree node has a compatible string to qualify what kind of
> information the node is describing. The compatible string for device
> tree nodes describing a kernel binary or a ramdisk previously loaded
> into memory by a bootloader have a "multiboot," prefix. See
> docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt. This is unrelated to the binary
> multiboot protocol Grub uses on x86 to boot Xen.
> 
> A distinction between MB1 and MB2 is not needed in device tree, that
> information is retrieved via the Grub multiboot protocol as usual. The
> only thing needed here in device tree is the location of the kernel,
> either by RAM address, or by Grub multiboot module index. This last
> option (Grub multiboot module index) is the "module-index" property I
> mentioned above.

Hmm, then I'm afraid I can't make sense of the mentioning of MB1 in the
description. Yet that's a point more towards Daniel than you.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.