|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH] Arm: cpu_*_map adjustments
First, they all start out zeroed. There's no point doing an initial
cpumask_clear() on them.
Next, only cpu_online_map may be altered post-boot, and even that only
rarely. Add respective placement attributes.
Finally, cpu_present_map really isn't anything more than an alias of
cpu_possible_map. Avoid the copying, and have the linker provide the
symbol (if needed in the first place; it is needed right now as
common code references the symbol).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
I would have preferred to use __attribute__((alias(...))), but that
apparently (and following the doc) can't be used when a declaration of
the to-be-provided symbol is present earlier.
With the cpumask_clear()s dropped, the containing function's name is
now yet more out of sync with what the function does. On x86 we call a
similar thing smp_prepare_boot_cpu().
With x86 getting away without cpu_possible_map I wonder if we shouldn't
globally fold that and cpu_present_map, under whichever is deemed the
more suitable name of the two. There's little point in having new ports
adding perhaps yet more inconsistencies there.
--- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
@@ -35,9 +35,8 @@
#undef virt_to_mfn
#define virt_to_mfn(va) _mfn(__virt_to_mfn(va))
-cpumask_t cpu_online_map;
-cpumask_t cpu_present_map;
-cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
+cpumask_t __read_mostly cpu_online_map;
+cpumask_t __ro_after_init cpu_possible_map;
struct cpuinfo_arm cpu_data[NR_CPUS];
@@ -111,8 +110,6 @@ static void remove_cpu_sibling_map(int c
void __init
smp_clear_cpu_maps (void)
{
- cpumask_clear(&cpu_possible_map);
- cpumask_clear(&cpu_online_map);
cpumask_set_cpu(0, &cpu_online_map);
cpumask_set_cpu(0, &cpu_possible_map);
cpu_logical_map(0) = READ_SYSREG(MPIDR_EL1) & MPIDR_HWID_MASK;
@@ -312,8 +309,6 @@ smp_prepare_cpus(void)
{
int rc;
- cpumask_copy(&cpu_present_map, &cpu_possible_map);
-
rc = setup_cpu_sibling_map(0);
if ( rc )
panic("Unable to allocate CPU sibling/core maps\n");
--- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ SECTIONS
ELF_DETAILS_SECTIONS
}
+PROVIDE(cpu_present_map = cpu_possible_map);
+
/*
* The assembly code use _start and XEN_VIRT_START interchangeably to
* match the context.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |