[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] xen/riscv: Increase XEN_VIRT_SIZE
On 4/10/25 10:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.04.2025 21:01, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:--- a/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/mm.h @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <xen/mm-frame.h> #include <xen/pdx.h> #include <xen/pfn.h> +#include <xen/sections.h> #include <xen/types.h> #include <asm/page-bits.h> @@ -35,6 +36,11 @@ static inline void *maddr_to_virt(paddr_t ma) return (void *)va; } +#define is_init_section(p) ({ \ + char *p_ = (char *)(unsigned long)(p); \ + (p_ >= __init_begin) && (p_ < __init_end); \ +})I think this wants to be put in xen/sections.h, next to where __init_{begin,end} are declared. But first it wants making const-correct, to eliminate the potential of it indirectly casting away const-ness from the incoming argument. (At some point related stuff wants moving from kernel.h to sections.h, I suppose. And at that point they will all want to have const added.) Sure, I'll change to 'const char *p_ = (const char*)(unsigned long)(p)'. --- a/xen/arch/riscv/mm.c +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/mm.c @@ -31,20 +31,24 @@ unsigned long __ro_after_init phys_offset; /* = load_start - XEN_VIRT_START */ #define LOAD_TO_LINK(addr) ((unsigned long)(addr) - phys_offset) /* - * It is expected that Xen won't be more then 2 MB. + * It is expected that Xen won't be more then XEN_VIRT_SIZE MB.Why "MB" when the macro already expands to MB(16)? It should be really dropped, no need for MB in the comment. * The check in xen.lds.S guarantees that. - * At least 3 page tables (in case of Sv39 ) are needed to cover 2 MB. - * One for each page level table with PAGE_SIZE = 4 Kb. * - * One L0 page table can cover 2 MB(512 entries of one page table * PAGE_SIZE). + * Root page table is shared with the initial mapping and is declared + * separetely. (look at stage1_pgtbl_root)Nit: separately* - * It might be needed one more page table in case when Xen load address - * isn't 2 MB aligned. + * An amount of page tables between root page table and L0 page table + * (in the case of Sv39 it covers L1 table): + * (CONFIG_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) are needed for an identity mapping and + * the same amount are needed for Xen. * - * CONFIG_PAGING_LEVELS page tables are needed for the identity mapping, - * except that the root page table is shared with the initial mapping + * An amount of L0 page tables: + * (512 entries of one L0 page table covers 2MB == 1<<XEN_PT_LEVEL_SHIFT(1)) + * XEN_VIRT_SIZE >> XEN_PT_LEVEL_SHIFT(1) are needed for Xen and + * one L0 is needed for indenity mapping.Nit: identity But more importantly, where's this one L0 ...*/ -#define PGTBL_INITIAL_COUNT ((CONFIG_PAGING_LEVELS - 1) * 2 + 1) +#define PGTBL_INITIAL_COUNT ((CONFIG_PAGING_LEVELS - 2) * 2 + \ + (XEN_VIRT_SIZE >> XEN_PT_LEVEL_SHIFT(1))).... in this calculation? L0 for identity mapping is really missed. Thanks. ~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |