[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] bitops/32: Convert variable_ffs() and fls() zero-case handling to C
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 at 00:14, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > And, just out of intellectual curiosity, I also tried to measure the > > code generation price of the +1 standards-quirk in the fls()/ffs() > > interface as well: > > > > ... and unless I messed up the patch, it seems to have a surprisingly > > low impact - maybe because the compiler can amortize its cost by > > adjusting all dependent code mostly at build time, so the +1 doesn't > > end up being generated most of the time? > > No, I think one issue is that most users actually end up subtracting > one from the return value of 'ffs()', because the "bit #0 returns 1" > semantics of the standard ffs() function really is insane. > > It's not just that it doesn't match sane hardware, it's also that it > doesn't match sane *users*. If bit #0 is set, people want '0', so they > typically subtract 1. > > So when you stop adding one, you aren't actually removing code - > you're often adding it. > > Just see how many hits you get from > > git grep '\<ffs(.*).*-.*1' > > which is obviously not a very precise pattern, but just look at the > output and see just *how* common that "subtract one" thing is. > > I really don't understand how anybody *ever* thought that the whole > "return one bigger" was a good idea for ffs(). Yeah. No argument from me that it's a badly thought out interface - I was just surprised that it doesn't seem to impact performance as badly as I expected. I have to add that a lot of work went into absorbing the negative effects of the ffs()/fls() interfaces: starship:~/tip> git grep -Ee '__ffs\(|__fls\(' | wc -l 1055 So it impacts code quality negatively, which is arguably the worse side effect. > But maybe people really were poisoned by the Pascal mindset. Or maybe > it was invented by some ancient Roman who hadn't heard of the concept > of zero. Who knows? Hey, ancient Romans didn't even have the concept of *whitespaces* and punctuation to begin with: https://historyofinformation.com/images/Vergilius_Augusteus,_Georgica_121.jpg Lazy stonemasons the lot of them. Romans were the worst ever coders too I suspect. What have the Romans ever done for us?? Ingo
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |