[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/4] efi: Add a function to check if Secure Boot mode is enabled
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 5:56 PM Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > CC'ing the EFI maintainers. > > On 06/05/2025 5:24 pm, Kevin Lampis wrote: > > diff --git a/xen/common/efi/boot.c b/xen/common/efi/boot.c > > index e39fbc3529..7c528cd5dd 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c > > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c > > @@ -870,6 +870,27 @@ static void __init pre_parse(const struct file *file) > > " last line will be ignored.\r\n"); > > } > > > > +static void __init init_secure_boot_mode(void) > > +{ > > + EFI_STATUS status; > > + EFI_GUID gv_uuid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE; > > + uint8_t data = 0; > > + UINTN size = sizeof(data); > > + UINT32 attr = 0; > > Newline between variables and code please. > > > + status = efi_rs->GetVariable((CHAR16 *)L"SecureBoot", &gv_uuid, &attr, > > + &size, &data); > > + > > + if ( status == EFI_NOT_FOUND || > > + (status == EFI_SUCCESS && > > + attr == (EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS | > > EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS) && > > + size == 1 && data == 0) ) > > + /* Platform does not support Secure Boot or it's disabled. */ > > + efi_secure_boot = false; > > + else > > + /* Everything else play it safe and assume enabled. */ > > + efi_secure_boot = true; > > +} > > I'm not sure this logic does what you want when a weird answer comes > back from GetVariable(). > > Also, you can't have this be a common function, yet ... > > > diff --git a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > > index 7e1fce291d..b63d21f16c 100644 > > --- a/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > > +++ b/xen/common/efi/runtime.c > > @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ void efi_rs_leave(struct efi_rs_state *state); > > unsigned int __read_mostly efi_num_ct; > > const EFI_CONFIGURATION_TABLE *__read_mostly efi_ct; > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && !defined(CONFIG_PV_SHIM) > > +bool __ro_after_init efi_secure_boot; > > +#endif > > ... this variable exist only on x86. > On a more high level. Is secure boot specific to x86? I think it's generic so it should be compiled also for ARM or any EFI enabled architectures. > Also, why adjust it for PV shim? None of this is even compiled for PV shim. > > ~Andrew > Frediano
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |