[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] vpci/header: Emulate legacy capability list for dom0
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 05:05:34PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote: > Current logic of emulating legacy capability list is only for domU. > So, expand it to emulate for dom0 too. Then it will be easy to hide > a capability whose initialization fails in a function. > > And restrict adding PCI_STATUS register only for domU since dom0 > has no limitation to access that register. > > Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx> > --- > cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v3->v4 changes: > * Also pass supported_caps to pci_find_next_cap_ttl() for dom0 since the n is > zero when dom0, > and add a comment to explain it. > * Restrict adding PCI_STATUS register only for domU since dom0 has no > limitation to access that register. > * For dom0 register handler, set vpci_hw_write8 to it instead of NULL. > > v2->v3 changes: > * Not to add handler of PCI_CAP_LIST_ID when domain is dom0. > > v1->v2 changes: > new patch. > > Best regards, > Jiqian Chen. > --- > xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 6 +++++ > xen/include/xen/vpci.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > index 3e9b44454b43..a06c518c506c 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > @@ -749,9 +749,9 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > int rc; > bool mask_cap_list = false; > + bool is_hwdom = is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain); > > - if ( !is_hardware_domain(pdev->domain) && > - pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST ) > + if ( pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_STATUS) & PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST ) > { > /* Only expose capabilities to the guest that vPCI can handle. */ > unsigned int next, ttl = 48; > @@ -759,12 +759,18 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev > *pdev) > PCI_CAP_ID_MSI, > PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX, > }; > + /* > + * For dom0, we should expose all capabilities instead of a fixed > + * capabilities array, so setting n to 0 here is to get the next > + * capability position directly in pci_find_next_cap_ttl. > + */ > + const unsigned int n = is_hwdom ? 0 : ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps); > > next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST, > - supported_caps, > - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl); > + supported_caps, n, &ttl); > > - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL, > + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, > + is_hwdom ? vpci_hw_write8 : NULL, > PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST, 1, > (void *)(uintptr_t)next); > if ( rc ) > @@ -772,7 +778,7 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > next &= ~3; > > - if ( !next ) > + if ( !next && !is_hwdom ) > /* > * If we don't have any supported capabilities to expose to the > * guest, mask the PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST bit in the status > @@ -786,15 +792,18 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev > *pdev) > > next = pci_find_next_cap_ttl(pdev->sbdf, > pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, > - supported_caps, > - ARRAY_SIZE(supported_caps), &ttl); > + supported_caps, n, &ttl); > > - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL, > - pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL); > - if ( rc ) > - return rc; > + if ( !is_hwdom ) > + { > + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read8, NULL, > + pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_ID, 1, NULL); > + if ( rc ) > + return rc; > + } > > - rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, NULL, > + rc = vpci_add_register(pdev->vpci, vpci_read_val, > + is_hwdom ? vpci_hw_write8 : NULL, > pos + PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT, 1, > (void *)(uintptr_t)next); > if ( rc ) > @@ -805,13 +814,17 @@ static int vpci_init_capability_list(struct pci_dev > *pdev) > } > > /* Utilize rsvdp_mask to hide PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST from the guest. */ > - return vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16, > vpci_hw_write16, > - PCI_STATUS, 2, NULL, > - PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK & > - ~(mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : > 0), > - PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK, > - mask_cap_list ? PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0, > - PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK); > + return is_hwdom ? 0 : vpci_add_register_mask(pdev->vpci, vpci_hw_read16, > + vpci_hw_write16, PCI_STATUS, > + 2, NULL, > + PCI_STATUS_RO_MASK & > + ~(mask_cap_list ? > + PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : > + 0), > + PCI_STATUS_RW1C_MASK, > + mask_cap_list ? > + PCI_STATUS_CAP_LIST : 0, > + PCI_STATUS_RSVDZ_MASK); Wow, that's a bit too much indentation for my taste. Do you think you could do: /* Return early for the hw domain, no masking of PCI_STATUS. */ if ( is_hwdom ) return 0; ... So that you don't have to touch the current return chunk? Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |