Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] x86/msr: Convert a native_wrmsr() use to native_wrmsrq()

[Xin Li <xin@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 5/15/2025 10:54 AM, Xin Li wrote:
>>> On 5/15/2025 8:27 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> * Xin Li (Intel) <xin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Convert a native_wrmsr() use to native_wrmsrq() to zap meaningless type
>>>>> conversions when a u64 MSR value is splitted into two u32.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> BTW., at this point we should probably just replace
>>>> sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr() calls with direct calls to:
>>>> 
>>>>     native_wrmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB, ...);
>>>> 
>>>> as sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr() is now basically an open-coded native_wrmsrq().
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I thought about it, however it looks to me that current code prefers not
>>> to spread MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB in 17 callsites.  And anyway it's a
>>> __always_inline function.
>>> 
>>> But as you have asked, I will make the change unless someone objects.
>> 
>> Hi Ingo,
>> 
>> I took a further look and found that we can't simply replace
>> sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr() with native_wrmsrq(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB, ...).
>> 
>> There are two sev_es_wr_ghcb_msr() definitions.  One is defined in
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.h and it references boot_wrmsr() defined in
>> arch/x86/boot/msr.h to do MSR write.
> 
> Ah, indeed, it's also a startup code wrapper, which wrmsrq() doesn't
> have at the moment. Fair enough.

So you want me to drop this patch then?

Thanks!
    Xin