Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] vpci: Hide legacy capability when it fails to initialize

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 07:35:49AM +0000, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/5/18 22:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 09.05.2025 11:05, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >> +static int vpci_capability_mask(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int cap)
> > 
> > What's the word "mask" indicating here? The function doesn't return any
> > mask afaics. Do you perhaps mean "hide"?
> Yes, hide.
> This is a question of naming preference.
> I remember Roger suggested this name, but maybe I remember wrong.
> For double confirmation, hi Roger, are you fine that I change this name from 
> mask to hide?

Sure, it's fine to use hide, and it's possibly more inline with how
we use hide in other functions (like pci_hide_device()).

Thanks, Roger.