Re: Hyperlaunch/dom0less code sharing

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 21 May 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.05.2025 16:35, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > I think we should aim to share binding code wherever possible, using common
> > datastructures (kernel_info and bootmodule) as dumping ground for the 
> > results
> > of the binding parsing functions. I seek agreement on the following 3 points
> > for the end goal of DTB multidomain boots on x86 before I start slicing
> > my hacks into reasonable chunks.
> > 
> >   1. We want common data structures, with arch-specific fields to hold
> >      information from xen,domain DT nodes
> >   2. We want to have a single collection of DTB parsers in the code.
> >   3. We want to operate on the unflattened DTB for the majority of parsing.
> >     (plus a minimal version on the FDT in order to bootstrap, also common)
> 
> +1 on all three, with the caveat that I'm far from being an expert on DT.

+1 from me as well