[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] xen/arm: ffa: Add indirect message between VM


  • To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 06:37:31 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 4.158.2.129) smtp.rcpttodomain=linaro.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yuGhrbvwPujqvDryH/rJ1rbDnCyY1eN/Ff6Wa5GnYlM=; b=aDQ0/mVu2UNRoebTjKqHifLodj7h4JKntv2ymJGz/Nga2gPe0E2qm9y/BUHXJyiTMK3yl1J50dEaiOxjNisU/e+9MvSecc5rF5xbxZahSL8gf5SokLz1lZPNgczNP6nQtwFl6MUAK7N9gdm1DkMtOvOa6yXszyEq/5k4NilZPNEi/Bhp18EVI98kjrKxlf0Pu+zMT5NzgIHJeJwQcgDLoun+7h1z7ab5GBF0Uq8zkr7y+TS/ntQcsKAwGkRKV+5U1680YIGenoHug0MAkoEcJO2Qkzi3YVA7TfjjHPf7OI0uzeIaLuJ1eAPeFiMRexT+gtLkHk5ddG32Y9w7tATQ5A==
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yuGhrbvwPujqvDryH/rJ1rbDnCyY1eN/Ff6Wa5GnYlM=; b=Auo6kHO2zwTl0qsJqps6AvvqHEGe8oWcoHVWC0YwDe5PxdWJ0w9cSRV25Rh0eGpKuwG66BKmSCSaM2phjI/EqyLNomOIymznPtuc6XI6D6M7q1snB5oyzFan9G3PjF8h7hFz6EUqLRB/YYKJhVXmCBN0O6sNtRfXBjYnjvMuAb1RixfeGh1CKOOM7pcP5Qgi1aDmr0rdSDP+1XiLeCM9C2Sf/Gsw0QxAyeJrPCW4xeRcFDSloRX0pDKk1bKbzbXDAVCBC0t0vzd+ykfWDNmQCK+asczw//eEeKejkLTXTiTuC4AjBW5pmhYaqBqJ3+9Sb1cK2lWrViduci7CXL6cyg==
  • Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=QE3e7I4wfOeBIl0VTMaAuwz40hE6DCkntTL56otMOuNEAYXwttjgZ772bxZqF5T9zy2nAWeMbFqHaXeNk9F1gPQJFdl2X2MQP+Gu2vL905SWFcWEQWKtGtlkU2vwI3LJe+/o+oNf5DK8fRat2Xmn5rKQzIiOrIEkC+PyKLV6kMAdP+MPrtRzxSn+vlUfhEQpNXvtbuX5idSvy1htSRNlAI4W+Iauu5azCT/s8rYOY/5cwsTmTYA56I9ldn2FO4bdLETDOksI04QVqMbKy9tkLEJD7bHNf2IiB/3psiBPeknnYLvUzghGTkIc66KvxZ3azJbV65XuGYFtZL2Jx5xrlQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=qWl6JSc6rslhRoiRgz99G0eRW5b5QBZ6MXpSL/QY0ZrtTp9T062SUvfXNJO6btfVT5sVF4xiZHfKPtPLIbvoDdfjIOlgQR4StL8VZeY5yweonq5VM388MYpsjjSEifsUfL492o28xe0IV+fObdI3NEPilj6gB6JN41rh8z2kHV8UHi2gmZq8WY0Gps2BymrxAhUlXqOSVn1W9YQm8wAQGfID1ddcgCKK4LncfackOtns4Sv7F4ABcJTnQtZEufq/1ONtGrKzUYZiGtvHcI5Bj52EzUwSR6QJpPG/ytl06HJ95Z94GYhfFSAOYjdy+j79epF3cAmDrcg/k9sSJJIShQ==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 22 May 2025 06:41:21 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Thread-index: AQHbrqLZUo9s1RWIvkuj+N+Xve97jrPdhJCAgADmGoA=
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v5 5/6] xen/arm: ffa: Add indirect message between VM


> On 21 May 2025, at 18:53, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Bertrand,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 9:40 AM Bertrand Marquis
> <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Add support for indirect messages between VMs.
>> This is only enabled if CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM is selected.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Prevent potential overflow in send2 handling (Julien)
>> - Only use page_count with rx lock acquired
>> - Fix an issue where send2 between VMs was not doing the copy from the
>>  tx buffer but from a wrong location in the stack. This bug was
>>  introduced in v4 when switching to a local copy for the header.
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Use a local copy of the message header to prevent a TOC/TOU possible
>>  issue when using the payload size
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Move vm to vm indirect message handling in a sub function to simplify
>>  lock handling and make implementation easier to read
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Switch ifdef to IS_ENABLED
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
>> index ee594e737fc7..35de260c013a 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_msg.c
>> @@ -88,43 +88,130 @@ out:
>>                  resp.a7 & mask);
>> }
>> 
>> +static int32_t ffa_msg_send2_vm(uint16_t dst_id, const void *src_buf,
>> +                                struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *src_msg)
>> +{
>> +    struct domain *dst_d;
>> +    struct ffa_ctx *dst_ctx;
>> +    struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *dst_msg;
>> +    int err;
>> +    int32_t ret;
>> +
>> +    if ( dst_id == 0 )
>> +        /* FF-A ID 0 is the hypervisor, this is not valid */
>> +        return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> +
>> +    /* This is also checking that dest is not src */
>> +    err = rcu_lock_live_remote_domain_by_id(dst_id - 1, &dst_d);
>> +    if ( err )
>> +        return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> +
>> +    if ( dst_d->arch.tee == NULL )
>> +    {
>> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> +        goto out_unlock;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dst_ctx = dst_d->arch.tee;
>> +    if ( !dst_ctx->guest_vers )
>> +    {
>> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> +        goto out_unlock;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* This also checks that destination has set a Rx buffer */
>> +    ret = ffa_rx_acquire(dst_d);
>> +    if ( ret )
>> +        goto out_unlock;
>> +
>> +    /* we need to have enough space in the destination buffer */
>> +    if ( (dst_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE -
>> +          sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx)) < src_msg->msg_size )
>> +    {
>> +        ret = FFA_RET_NO_MEMORY;
>> +        ffa_rx_release(dst_d);
>> +        goto out_unlock;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    dst_msg = dst_ctx->rx;
>> +
>> +    /* prepare destination header */
>> +    dst_msg->flags = 0;
>> +    dst_msg->reserved = 0;
>> +    dst_msg->msg_offset = sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx);
>> +    dst_msg->send_recv_id = src_msg->send_recv_id;
>> +    dst_msg->msg_size = src_msg->msg_size;
>> +
>> +    memcpy(dst_ctx->rx + sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx),
>> +           src_buf + src_msg->msg_offset, src_msg->msg_size);
>> +
>> +    /* receiver rx buffer will be released by the receiver*/
>> +
>> +out_unlock:
>> +    rcu_unlock_domain(dst_d);
>> +    if ( !ret )
>> +        ffa_raise_rx_buffer_full(dst_d);
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> int32_t ffa_handle_msg_send2(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>> {
>>     struct domain *src_d = current->domain;
>>     struct ffa_ctx *src_ctx = src_d->arch.tee;
>> -    const struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx *src_msg;
>> +    struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx src_msg;
>>     uint16_t dst_id, src_id;
>>     int32_t ret;
>> 
>> -    if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_MSG_SEND2) )
>> -        return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) >= FFA_PAGE_SIZE);
>> 
>>     if ( !spin_trylock(&src_ctx->tx_lock) )
>>         return FFA_RET_BUSY;
>> 
>> -    src_msg = src_ctx->tx;
>> -    src_id = src_msg->send_recv_id >> 16;
>> -    dst_id = src_msg->send_recv_id & GENMASK(15,0);
>> +    /* create a copy of the message header */
>> +    memcpy(&src_msg, src_ctx->tx, sizeof(src_msg));
>> 
>> -    if ( src_id != ffa_get_vm_id(src_d) || !FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dst_id) )
>> +    src_id = src_msg.send_recv_id >> 16;
>> +    dst_id = src_msg.send_recv_id & GENMASK(15,0);
>> +
>> +    if ( src_id != ffa_get_vm_id(src_d) )
>>     {
>>         ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> -        goto out_unlock_tx;
>> +        goto out;
>>     }
>> 
>>     /* check source message fits in buffer */
>> -    if ( src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE <
>> -         src_msg->msg_offset + src_msg->msg_size ||
>> -         src_msg->msg_offset < sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) )
>> +    if ( src_msg.msg_offset < sizeof(struct ffa_part_msg_rxtx) ||
>> +            src_msg.msg_size == 0 ||
>> +            src_msg.msg_offset > src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE ||
>> +            src_msg.msg_size > (src_ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE -
>> +                                src_msg.msg_offset) )
>>     {
>>         ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> -        goto out_unlock_tx;
>> +        goto out;
>>     }
>> 
>> -    ret = ffa_simple_call(FFA_MSG_SEND2,
>> +    if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dst_id) )
>> +    {
>> +        /* Message for a secure partition */
>> +        if ( !ffa_fw_supports_fid(FFA_MSG_SEND2) )
>> +        {
>> +            ret = FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> +            goto out;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        ret = ffa_simple_call(FFA_MSG_SEND2,
>>                           ((uint32_t)ffa_get_vm_id(src_d)) << 16, 0, 0, 0);
> 
> Please align with the opening '(' at the row above.

Will do.

> 
> Other than that:
> Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks
Bertrand

> Cheers,
> Jens
> 
>> +    }
>> +    else if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FFA_VM_TO_VM) )
>> +    {
>> +        /* Message for a VM */
>> +        ret = ffa_msg_send2_vm(dst_id, src_ctx->tx, &src_msg);
>> +    }
>> +    else
>> +        ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>> 
>> -out_unlock_tx:
>> +out:
>>     spin_unlock(&src_ctx->tx_lock);
>>     return ret;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.47.1
>> 


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.