[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 04/10] vpci: Refactor REGISTER_VPCI_INIT


  • To: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 09:08:01 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Orzel, Michal" <Michal.Orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 07:08:14 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10.06.2025 05:52, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/6/9 18:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:18:42AM +0000, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2025/6/9 17:29, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 07:50:21AM +0000, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>>>> On 2025/6/6 17:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 09:05:48AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06.06.2025 08:29, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025/6/5 20:50, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 05:45:53PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>> +  }; \
>>>>>>>>>> +  static vpci_capability_t *const finit##_entry  \
>>>>>>>>>> +               __used_section(".data.vpci") = &finit##_t
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO this should better use .rodata instead of .data. 
>>>>>>>> Is below change correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +    static const vpci_capability_t *const finit##_entry  \
>>>>>>>> +        __used_section(".rodata") = &finit##_t
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, specifically because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not that it matters much in practice, as we place it in .rodata 
>>>>>>>>> anyway.  Note
>>>>>>>>> however you will have to move the placement of the VPCI_ARRAY in the
>>>>>>>>> linker script ahead of *(.rodata.*), otherwise that section match will
>>>>>>>>> consume the vPCI data.
>>>>>>>> I am sorry, how to move it ahead of *(.rodata.*) ?
>>>>>>>> Is below change correct?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h b/xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h
>>>>>>>> index 793d0e11450c..3817642135aa 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
>>>>>>>>  #define VPCI_ARRAY               \
>>>>>>>>         . = ALIGN(POINTER_ALIGN); \
>>>>>>>>         __start_vpci_array = .;   \
>>>>>>>> -       *(SORT(.data.vpci.*))     \
>>>>>>>> +       *(.rodata)             \
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... this isn't - you'd move _all_ of .rodata into here, which definitely
>>>>>>> isn't what you want. What I understand Roger meant was a .rodata-like
>>>>>>> section, e.g. .rodata.vpci.* (much like it was .data.vpci.* before).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, my suggestion was merely to use .rodata instead of .data, as
>>>>>> that's more accurate IMO.  I think it should be *(.rodata.vpci) (and
>>>>>> same section change for the __used_section() attribute.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I understand correctly, the next version will be:
>>>>>
>>>>> +    static const vpci_capability_t *const finit##_entry  \
>>>>> +        __used_section(".rodata.vpci") = &finit##_t
>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>  #define VPCI_ARRAY               \
>>>>>         . = ALIGN(POINTER_ALIGN); \
>>>>>         __start_vpci_array = .;   \
>>>>> -       *(SORT(.data.vpci.*))     \
>>>>> +       *(.rodata.vpci)           \
>>>>>         __end_vpci_array = .;
>>>>
>>>> Did you also move the instances of VPCI_ARRAY in the linker scripts so
>>>> it's before the catch-all *(.rodata.*)?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But, that encountered an warning when compiling.
>>>>> " {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>>>>> {standard input}:1160: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for 
>>>>> .rodata.vpci
>>>>> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>>>>> {standard input}:3034: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for 
>>>>> .rodata.vpci
>>>>> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>>>>> {standard input}:6686: Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for 
>>>>> .rodata.vpci "
>>>>
>>>> What are the attributes for .rodata.vpci in the object files?  You can
>>>> get those using objdump or readelf, for example:
>>>>
>>>> $ objdump -h xen/drivers/vpci/msi.o
>>>> [...]
>>>>  17 .data.vpci.9  00000008  0000000000000000  0000000000000000  00000a50  
>>>> 2**3
>>>>                   CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, DATA
>>>>
>>>> It should be READONLY, otherwise you will get those messages.
>>>>
>>>>> And, during booting Xen, all value of __start_vpci_array is incorrect.
>>>>> Do I miss anything?
>>>>
>>>> I think that's likely because you haven't moved the instance of
>>>> VPCI_ARRAY in the linker script?
>>> Oh, right. Sorry, I forgot to move it.
>>> After changing this, it works now.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>>> index bf956b6c5fc0..c88fd62f4f0d 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
>>> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ SECTIONS
>>>         BUGFRAMES
>>>
>>>         *(.rodata)
>>> +       VPCI_ARRAY
>>>         *(.rodata.*)
>>>         *(.data.rel.ro)
>>>         *(.data.rel.ro.*)
>>> @@ -148,7 +149,6 @@ SECTIONS
>>>         *(.note.gnu.build-id)
>>>         __note_gnu_build_id_end = .;
>>>  #endif
>>> -       VPCI_ARRAY
>>>    } PHDR(text)
>>
>> FWIW, I would put it ahead of *(.rodata).  Remember to also modify the
>> linker script for all the other arches, not just x86.
> 
> Whether before *(.rodata.*) or before *(.rodata), there still is the warning 
> " Warning: setting incorrect section attributes for .rodata.vpci "
> And the objdump shows "rodata.vpci" has no "readonly" word.

Did you check what gcc emits? It may be requesting "aw" instead of the
wanted "a" in the section attributes. Since there are relocations here,
".rodata." may not be the correct prefix to use; it may instead need to
be ".data.rel.ro.".

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.