[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Proposed x86 shadow paging changes


  • To: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 14:12:21 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 12:12:40 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 12.06.2025 13:45, Teddy Astie wrote:
> In Xen x86, there is the shadow paging that could be used in some cases 
> (notably with HVM), and is used when HAP is not available. It may also 
> be used in very specific cases for PV guests.
> 
> With the vast majority of hardware supporting HAP (through EPT or NPT), 
> it's rarely used in practice for HVM, with most downstream projects 
> (XenServer, XCP-ng, QubesOS) are compiling-out its support by default. 
> It also performs very significantly worse than HAP.

Whenever this argument was made, iirc it was in particular George (who
was involved in the original work aiui) who kept pointing that such a
statement is not generally true, for numbers being workload dependent.

> Therefore, it's not very used in production, and unsurprisingly isn't 
> actively being worked on (most projects being around HAP).

Is it not? Feel free to review this 2 year old series
(https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-05/msg01140.html),
to allow it to finally go in. I'm simply reluctant to do any other work
in that area until such earlier work was properly settled. In fact I may
have added one or two patches on top in the meantime, but I saw no good
reason to even post them, given the state of the series.

> One of the issues of Shadow Paging is that it relies on a heavy set of 
> optimizations, with some of them being effectively obselete 
> (optimisations based on heuristics designed for more than 20 years old 
> kernels) or eventually problematic (e.g with modern CPU mitigations e.g 
> L1TF mitigations).
> Most of these optimizations are hard to reason regarding reliability and 
> security and difficult to debug. Some of these optimizations causes very 
> subtle issues with TLB refactoring for ASID management rework [1].
> Moreover, it's fair to say performance is no longer the priority for 
> shadow paging.
> 
> My proposal would be to :
> - significantly reduce the complexity of shadow paging by dropping most 
> of the complex optimizations

If such can be proven to have no dramatic effect on performance, maybe.

> - consider Shadow Paging as Deprecated

I consider this impossible as long as it's still used for PV migration
and PV L1TF fallback. In particular ...

>  > Functional completeness: Yes
>  > Functional stability: Quirky
>  > Interface stability: No (as in, may disappear the next release)

... I don't see this as being possible to happen any time soon.

Jan

>  > Security supported: Yes
> 
> Teddy
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/9cdb3e67abd01390bcc4cd103ca539d6bf7adbc0.1747312394.git.teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> 
>  | Vates
> 
> XCP-ng & Xen Orchestra - Vates solutions
> 
> web: https://vates.tech
> 
> 




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.