[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/EFI: Fix detection of buildid


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 08:27:46 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 06:27:56 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.06.2025 23:28, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/06/2025 9:01 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.06.2025 17:01, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2025 8:22 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> And then, based on your reasoning above, why don't you also drop the
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86?
>>> Because that's the one non-buggy way of excluding an impossible case.
>>>
>>> x86 is the only architecture possibly linking with pep emulation, and
>>> therefore the only architecture to possibly have a CodeView record.
>> And how's the, say, Arm case different from the x86 case with no such
>> record built in? 
> 
> Because its currently impossible for ARM to have a codeview record.

There must be some pretty fundamental misunderstanding then: I can only
ask again - how's this different from xen.gz? There's not going to be
CodeView record there, yet still you enable the logic there. Hence the
body of the conditional is unreachable in that case.

To expand on my earlier suggestion (ab)using the "efi" global: With
the linker script having this

#ifdef EFI
  .reloc ALIGN(4) : {
    __base_relocs_start = .;
    *(.reloc)
    __base_relocs_end = .;
  }
#elif defined(XEN_BUILD_EFI)
  /*
   * Due to the way EFI support is currently implemented, these two symbols
   * need to be defined.  Their precise values shouldn't matter (the consuming
   * function doesn't get called), but to be on the safe side both values would
   * better match.  Of course the need to be reachable by the relocations
   * referencing them.
   */
  PROVIDE(__base_relocs_start = .);
  PROVIDE(__base_relocs_end = .);
#else
  efi = .;
#endif

where only the #if applies to xen.efi, can't we (ab)use the combination of the
other two symbols here to decide between xen.efi vs xen.gz?
__base_relocs_{start,efi} won't possibly be equal for xen.efi, except in an
extremely theoretical situation (and we could cover for that case by an ASSERT
in the linker script). Pseudo code:

#ifdef XEN_BUILD_EFI
    if ( __base_relocs_start != __base_relocs_end )
    {
        ...
    }
#endif

IOW that #if could simply replace the CONFIG_X86 one that's there right now.

> Remember that ARM writes a MZ/PE header by hand in a flat binary.  It
> does not use a PEP linker.

Of course. Much like for xen.gz there's no PEP linking involved.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.