[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] pdx: allow per-arch optimization of PDX conversion helpers


  • To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:04:48 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 16:05:08 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 25.06.2025 17:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 03:51:09PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.06.2025 13:11, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pdx.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef X86_PDX_H
>>> +#define X86_PDX_H
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_PDX_NONE
>>> +
>>> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Introduce a macro to avoid repeating the same asm goto block in each 
>>> helper.
>>> + * Note the macro is strictly tied to the code in the helpers.
>>> + */
>>> +#define PDX_ASM_GOTO_SKIP                           \
>>> +    asm_inline goto (                               \
>>> +        ALTERNATIVE(                                \
>>> +            "",                                     \
>>> +            "jmp %l[skip]",                         \
>>> +            ALT_NOT(X86_FEATURE_PDX_COMPRESSION))   \
>>> +        : : : : skip )
>>
>> Did you consider passing the label name as argument to the macro? That way 
>> ...
>>
>>> +static inline unsigned long pfn_to_pdx(unsigned long pfn)
>>> +{
>>> +    PDX_ASM_GOTO_SKIP;
>>> +
>>> +    return pfn_to_pdx_xlate(pfn);
>>> +
>>> + skip:
>>> +    return pfn;
>>> +}
>>
>> ... the labels here and below then wouldn't look unused.
> 
> Yes - that's why I've added the "Note the macro is strictly tied to
> the code in the helpers" comment ahead of the macro, and named it as
> "GOTO_SKIP" to explicitly reference the label name.  I could pass the
> label name however if that's preferred, ie: PDX_ASM_GOTO(skip).  IMO
> It seems a bit redundant since all callers will pass the same label
> name.

Well, that comment isn't necessarily "in sight" when looking at the
functions using the macro. Personally I'd favor passing the label as
an argument; indeed I think we would better try to do away with other
such macros where inputs are implicit. Yes, there may be cases where
that's hard or getting unwieldy. But the one here isn't one of them.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.