[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/x86: address violations of Rule 11.3
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jan Beulich wrote: > > What fine grained deviation do you have in mind? > > Ones for almost(?) everything that is having actual code changes right now > in this series. We could easily deviate alternative.c based on the file name alone. But for the rest: emulate.c: casts from unsigned char* (byte aligned) to uint64_t* (8 bytes aligned) vlapic.h: casts from uint8_t* (byte aligned) to uint32_t* (4 bytes aligned) setup.c: games with symbols iommu_init.c: cast from uint32_t* (4 bytes aligned) to uint64_t* (8 bytes aligned) How would you deviate these in general terms? Or are you suggesting to use SAF tags for each of them? I suggest we consider taking the patch as is, or globally deviating this rule for x86 (or keep the rule but not enabling it in ECLAIR for x86).
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |