|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] vtd: Collapse x86 subdirectory
Le 23/10/2025 à 12:20, Jan Beulich a écrit :
> On 23.10.2025 11:12, Teddy Astie wrote:
>> The x86 subdirectory was originally meant to split x86-specific logic from
>> general VT-d code. Today, Xen only supports VT-d on x86 and the code actually
>> implemented in this subdirectory isn't x86-specific (e.g ATS code is not x86
>> specific).
>>
>> As ats.c is the only remaining file in this directory, and isn't x86
>> specific,
>> move it up to vtd directory and remove the now empty x86 subdirectory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - reviewed commit description
>>
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/Makefile | 3 +--
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/{x86 => }/ats.c | 10 +++++-----
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/Makefile | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> rename xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/{x86 => }/ats.c (97%)
>> delete mode 100644 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/x86/Makefile
>
> I should have remembered this when looking at v1 already: While some of your
> other changes go farther (and hence are likely preferable), this one I'd
> rather
> not see go in. I'd favor respective pieces of what's still pending from
> https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2024-02/msg00983.html. First and
> foremost because ATS really is not only not x86-specific - it's not VT-d-
> specific either.
CC-ing Jason Andryuk now reviewer of AMD-Vi code and likely interested
with https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2024-02/msg00983.html
at least for the AMD part.
I wasn't aware of this pending series. And some of my patches overlap
with some of these ones, so I guess we need to complete it and then I
rebase mine on top of it.
>
> Jan
>
--
Teddy Astie | Vates XCP-ng Developer
XCP-ng & Xen Orchestra - Vates solutions
web: https://vates.tech
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |