Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On 05/11/2025 02:46, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Since commit b9ef323ea168 ("powerpc/64s: Disable preemption in hash
>>> lazy mmu mode") a task can not be preempted while in lazy MMU mode.
>>> Therefore, the batch re-activation code is never called, so remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/thread_info.h |  2 --
>>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c          | 25 -------------------------
>>>  2 files changed, 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Since the commit referenced in above disables the preemption in
>> arch_enter_lazy_mmu(), so the expectation is that we will never be
>> context switched while in lazy_mmu, hence the code changes in
>> switch_to() around __flush_tlb_pending() should ideally never be called.
>
> Correct, that's the idea.
>
>> With this analysis - the patch looks good to me. I will give this entire
>> patch series a try on Power HW with Hash mmu too (which uses lazy mmu and
>> let you know the results of that)!
>
> That'd be very appreciated, thanks a lot!
>

I did give this patch series a run on Power10 with Hash MMU. I ran the
following stress-ng tests and didn't observe any issues (kernel warnings) so 
far.

stress-ng --all 0 -t 60s --perf -v --verify \
--tlb-shootdown 0 \
--fault 0 \
--userfaultfd 0 \
--fork 0 \
--exec 0 \
--memfd 0 \
--numa 0 \
--pkey 0 \
--remap 0 \
--vm 0 \
--rmap 0 \
-x swap,pagemove
(Note not all options shown here will work with --verify)

Let me know what else I can run for validation?
Do you know of any specific tests for validation of lazy mmu feature?

>> For this patch please feel free to add:
>> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> CC: Venkat who also runs CI on linux Power HW for upstream testing :)
>
> Ack, will Cc you both in the next version.

Sure. Thanks!

-ritesh