[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [for 4.22 v5 17/18] xen/riscv: add support of page lookup by GFN


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:46:47 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 16:46:51 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 20.10.2025 17:58, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> @@ -1049,3 +1049,178 @@ int map_regions_p2mt(struct domain *d,
>  
>      return rc;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * p2m_get_entry() should always return the correct order value, even if an
> + * entry is not present (i.e. the GFN is outside the range):
> + *   [p2m->lowest_mapped_gfn, p2m->max_mapped_gfn]).    (1)

There's one closing parenthesis too many here (likely the one before the colon).

> + * This ensures that callers of p2m_get_entry() can determine what range of
> + * address space would be altered by a corresponding p2m_set_entry().
> + * Also, it would help to avoid cost page walks for GFNs outside range (1).

DYM "costly"?

> + * Therefore, this function returns true for GFNs outside range (1), and in
> + * that case the corresponding level is returned via the level_out argument.
> + * Otherwise, it returns false and p2m_get_entry() performs a page walk to
> + * find the proper entry.
> + */
> +static bool check_outside_boundary(gfn_t gfn, gfn_t boundary, bool is_lower,
> +                                   unsigned int *level_out)
> +{
> +    unsigned int level;
> +
> +    if ( is_lower ? gfn_x(gfn) < gfn_x(boundary)
> +                  : gfn_x(gfn) > gfn_x(boundary) )
> +    {
> +        unsigned long mask = 0;
> +
> +        for ( level = P2M_ROOT_LEVEL; level; level-- )
> +        {
> +            unsigned long masked_gfn;
> +
> +            mask |= PFN_DOWN(P2M_LEVEL_MASK(level));
> +            masked_gfn = gfn_x(gfn) & mask;
> +
> +            if ( is_lower ? masked_gfn < gfn_x(boundary)
> +                          : masked_gfn > gfn_x(boundary) )
> +            {
> +                *level_out = level;

For this to be correct in the is_lower case, don't you need to fill the
bottom bits of masked_gfn with all 1s, rather than with all 0s? Otherwise
the tail of the range may be above boundary.

> +struct page_info *p2m_get_page_from_gfn(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn,
> +                                        p2m_type_t *t)
> +{
> +    struct page_info *page;
> +    p2m_type_t p2mt = p2m_invalid;
> +    mfn_t mfn;
> +
> +    p2m_read_lock(p2m);
> +    mfn = p2m_get_entry(p2m, gfn, t, NULL);
> +
> +    if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) )
> +    {
> +        p2m_read_unlock(p2m);
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ( t )
> +        p2mt = *t;

Doesn't it need to be the other way around? The way you have it, when a caller
passes NULL for t, p2m_get_entry() won't give you a type, and you'll do all
further work with p2m_invalid.

Also, might this better move ahead of the earlier if()? Callers might be able
to do still something based on the type, when they get back NULL as function
return value. (Practically this might only become of interest once you add
something like PoD, paging, or sharing.)

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.