[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 09/28] xen/vm_event: consolidate CONFIG_VM_EVENT


  • To: "Penny, Zheng" <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 09:13:36 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@xxxxxxx>, "oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx" <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Orzel, Michal" <Michal.Orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petre Pircalabu <ppircalabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 08:14:03 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 11.11.2025 08:08, Penny, Zheng wrote:
> [Public]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry for the late response. Just got back from long annual leaves
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_access.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_access.h
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>>  #ifndef __ASM_X86_MEM_ACCESS_H__
>>>  #define __ASM_X86_MEM_ACCESS_H__
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT
>>>  /*
>>>   * Setup vm_event request based on the access (gla is -1ull if not 
>>> available).
>>>   * Handles the rw2rx conversion. Boolean return value indicates if event 
>>> type
>>> @@ -25,6 +26,14 @@
>>>  bool p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
>>>                            struct npfec npfec,
>>>                            struct vm_event_st **req_ptr);
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline bool p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
>>> +                                        struct npfec npfec,
>>> +                                        struct vm_event_st **req_ptr)
>>> +{
>>> +    return false;
>>
>> Leaving *req_ptr untouched feels dangerous; the fact that the sole caller has
>> what it uses set to NULL up front is secondary.
>>
> 
> If we *req_ptr = NULL; compiler will not DCE the following code block when 
> VM_EVENT=n:
> ```
>         if ( req_ptr )
>         {
>                 if ( monitor_traps(curr, sync, req_ptr) < 0 )
>                         rc = 0;
> 
>                 xfree(req_ptr);
>         }
>         return rc;
> ```
> Or am I misunderstanding what you suggest?

First: It would have helped if you had also said where that code fragment 
actually
was taken from.

Seeing it's in hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(), I'm having trouble following why the
compiler wouldn't be able to see that the local variable "req_ptr" there would
never change value, i.e. remain NULL throughout its lifetime. If indeed there's 
a
compiler shortcoming, that either wants working around or properly writing down.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.