[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] xen/mem_access: wrap memory access when VM_EVENT=n


  • To: Penny Zheng <Penny.Zheng@xxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 10:48:50 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petre Pircalabu <ppircalabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:49:05 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.11.2025 04:16, Penny Zheng wrote:
> Feature memory access is based on vm event subsystem, and it could be disabled
> in the future. So a few switch-blocks in do_altp2m_op() need
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VM_EVENT) wrapping to pass compilation when ALTP2M=y and
> VM_EVENT=n(, hence MEM_ACCESS=n), like HVMOP_altp2m_set_mem_access, etc.
> Function p2m_mem_access_check() still needs stub when VM_EVENT=n to
> pass compilation.
> Although local variable "req_ptr" still remains NULL throughout its lifetime,
> with the change of NULL assignment, we will face runtime undefined error only
> when CONFIG_USBAN is on. So we strengthen the condition check via adding
> vm_event_is_enabled() for the special case.

As to this, didn't I ask for ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>  #include <asm/i387.h>
>  #include <asm/mc146818rtc.h>
>  #include <asm/mce.h>
> +#include <asm/mem_access.h>
>  #include <asm/monitor.h>
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/mtrr.h>
> @@ -2081,7 +2082,7 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned 
> long gla,
>  #endif
>      }
>  
> -    if ( req_ptr )
> +    if ( req_ptr && vm_event_is_enabled(curr) )
>      {
>          if ( monitor_traps(curr, sync, req_ptr) < 0 )
>              rc = 0;

... a comment next to the (now seemingly excessive) condition?

> @@ -4862,58 +4863,70 @@ static int do_altp2m_op(
>          break;
>  
>      case HVMOP_altp2m_set_mem_access:
> -        if ( a.u.mem_access.pad )
> -            rc = -EINVAL;
> -        else
> -            rc = p2m_set_mem_access(d, _gfn(a.u.mem_access.gfn), 1, 0, 0,
> -                                    a.u.mem_access.access,
> -                                    a.u.mem_access.view);
> +        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VM_EVENT) )

Wouldn't this then better be vm_event_is_enabled()? Or can this (and the ones 
below)
be carried out ahead of enabling? Tamas?

In any event, here and even more so ...

> +        {
> +            if ( a.u.mem_access.pad )
> +                rc = -EINVAL;
> +            else
> +                rc = p2m_set_mem_access(d, _gfn(a.u.mem_access.gfn), 1, 0, 0,
> +                                        a.u.mem_access.access,
> +                                        a.u.mem_access.view);
> +        }
>          break;
>  
>      case HVMOP_altp2m_set_mem_access_multi:
> -        if ( a.u.set_mem_access_multi.pad ||
> -             a.u.set_mem_access_multi.opaque > a.u.set_mem_access_multi.nr )
> +        if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VM_EVENT) )

... here please avoid this heavy churn by using the inverted condition plus 
break;
In all cases you fiddle with rc also needs setting to a suitable error 
indicator,
e.g. -EOPNOTSUPP, I think.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.