[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/domctl: Conditionalise x86 domctl using DCE rather than ifdef


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.garciavallejo@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 10:33:45 +0100
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=suse.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0)
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=rUCLTSsLiTD19y3HdUTJnVOqun1ElPoSVVgAqf/qA3s=; b=lDCGfB/4vedVOBpFgQYSqUGDRnmaXmVUKQl2G8gkHgnJA5R5Inxa3wwE+USlKxd7lmq9AZbRFG+b44X81SlNDnkFANsKucwpWw0HJoFbnehE5fKFM23po87rNihuQvJAXBj+hOwU9z97aX8z8VsOY8tJU7ur1suwxl1USeHjJPxVOeQE413HkrhtoIyE27yFQx9pgfK8LYcfycxg6H4b8M2WE6cJ2oub8bcNOqgo/PC7pJ/DCZwO9GKCpit8Hj46lM3kO6WSJJyL9I7LvJKOku995y5XTN7ygvWrCuZLemv+GC4NcmZaMpqQYM2p3HEsdW9Ujj5RauGiVK8H41OCpQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Us6N8lX8HJMcZzTB6SqQZyWhFA/vqecnBvJ+ip27D0lMFxnVWRdzXX5shRTma2DGBQTEJcb0YdD8mMGrH2JFcjA0DWGd9e4UqejRDHM68EJFI7xXR8Bx2HexOEqJNvQ95Kfavb8tWJV/IWBBmQmYgxso9bMqp8Mi5pQlDIpXsaGf7Un46oJzo+pY9YwzPuNjyjCB+iZ8iGsoi8wzbHUq+zO/PIvsbZMmjA9RicNrNN5sEuXW/1didXAUj99b39KER3sbCxuDRqF4fzF1Zb0cEls8bw6PZMbCmBGFwJzym50o1x+yh9IokOQ+xPweUxlGXO2/L/iCXwoRLz7fqNpKuA==
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 09:34:11 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM CET, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.02.2026 18:30, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_sharing.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_sharing.h
>> @@ -9,10 +9,12 @@
>>  #ifndef __MEM_SHARING_H__
>>  #define __MEM_SHARING_H__
>>  
>> -#include <public/domctl.h>
>> -#include <public/memory.h>
>> +struct xen_domctl_mem_sharing_op;
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SHARING
>> +#include <xen/sched.h>
>> +
>> +struct xen_mem_sharing_op;
>>  
>>  #define mem_sharing_enabled(d) ((d)->arch.hvm.mem_sharing.enabled)
>>  
>> @@ -92,8 +94,6 @@ int mem_sharing_fork_reset(struct domain *d, bool 
>> reset_state,
>>  int mem_sharing_notify_enomem(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn,
>>                                bool allow_sleep);
>>  int mem_sharing_memop(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_sharing_op_t) arg);
>> -int mem_sharing_domctl(struct domain *d,
>> -                       struct xen_domctl_mem_sharing_op *mec);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Scans the p2m and relinquishes any shared pages, destroying
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ int mem_sharing_domctl(struct domain *d,
>>  int relinquish_shared_pages(struct domain *d);
>>  
>>  #else
>> +struct domctl;
>
> DYM struct domain? If so (can adjust while committing):
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

I did. Annoyingly I only recompiled on with mem_sharing enabled.

>
> Cc-ing Tamas at least for awareness; I think ./MAINTAINERS should enumerate
> this file in the X86 MEMORY SHARING section.
>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/p2m.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/p2m.h
>> @@ -806,12 +806,10 @@ static inline void p2m_pt_init(struct p2m_domain *p2m) 
>> {}
>>  void *map_domain_gfn(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn, mfn_t *mfn,
>>                       p2m_query_t q, uint32_t *pfec);
>>  
>> -#if P2M_AUDIT
>> -extern void audit_p2m(struct domain *d,
>> -                      uint64_t *orphans,
>> -                      uint64_t *m2p_bad,
>> -                      uint64_t *p2m_bad);
>> -#endif /* P2M_AUDIT */
>> +void audit_p2m(struct domain *d,
>> +               uint64_t *orphans,
>> +               uint64_t *m2p_bad,
>> +               uint64_t *p2m_bad);
>
> If already you adjust this beyond dropping the #ifdef, I think we also want to
> make use of line length, to better match e.g. the other prototype in patch
> context above. I'm likely to take the liberty of doing so while committing.
>
> Jan

Thanks, Jan.

Alejandro



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.