[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 02/27] xen/riscv: Implement construct_domain()


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:37:44 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:37:55 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10.03.2026 18:08, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/domain-build.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +
> +#include <xen/fdt-domain-build.h>
> +#include <xen/fdt-kernel.h>
> +#include <xen/init.h>
> +#include <xen/sched.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/current.h>
> +#include <asm/guest_access.h>
> +
> +int __init construct_domain(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo)

Are you actually altering what kinfo points to?

> +{
> +    struct vcpu *v = d->vcpu[0];
> +    struct cpu_user_regs *regs = vcpu_guest_cpu_user_regs(v);
> +
> +    BUG_ON(d->vcpu[0] == NULL);

Why not simply "!v"?

Also, while in the cover letter you state a dependency on another series,
this is somewhat unwieldy here. From the titles there I can't deduce which
of the patches would introduce vcpu_guest_cpu_user_regs(). Yet I would
have wanted to double check that it doesn't de-reference v already.

> +    BUG_ON(v->is_initialised);
> +
> +    kernel_load(kinfo);
> +    initrd_load(kinfo, copy_to_guest_phys);
> +    dtb_load(kinfo, copy_to_guest_phys);

These all return void, despite this also being used for non-Dom0. Is it
really fatal to a dom0less system if one out of many domains fail to be
built? Especially when, despite the name, there is a Dom0?

> +    regs->sepc = kinfo->entry;
> +
> +    /* Guest boot cpuid = 0 */
> +    regs->a0 = 0;
> +    regs->a1 = kinfo->dtb_paddr;
> +
> +    for ( unsigned int i = 1; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ )
> +    {
> +        if ( vcpu_create(d, i) == NULL )
> +        {
> +            printk("Failed to allocate %pd v%d\n", d, i);
> +            break;

And no error is indicated to the caller?

> +        }
> +
> +        printk("Created vcpu %d for %pd\n", i, d);

dprintk() at most, and if so, then please use %pv.

> +    }
> +
> +    domain_update_node_affinity(d);
> +
> +    v->is_initialised = 1;

This is a boolean field, so the rhs wants to be "true".

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.