[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86/efi: Add BGRT image preservation infrastructure


  • To: Soumyajyotii Ssarkar <soumyajyotisarkar23@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:05:09 +0100
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sarkarsoumyajyoti23@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:05:22 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 24.03.2026 13:33, Soumyajyotii Ssarkar wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> @@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
>  #include "efi.h"
>  #include <efi/efiprot.h>
>  #include <efi/efipciio.h>
> +#include <acpi/acconfig.h>
> +#include <acpi/actbl.h>
> +#include <acpi/actbl3.h>

I fear this is pretty fragile. acpi/acpi.h is what is supposed to be included
from outside of (the little bit of) ACPICA code that we have got. Which in
turn may conflict with efi/*.h, which is why previously I had suggested to put
the ACPI parsing code elsewhere (if indeed nothing we already have can be
reused).

>  #include <public/xen.h>
>  #include <xen/bitops.h>
>  #include <xen/compile.h>
>  #include <xen/ctype.h>
>  #include <xen/dmi.h>
>  #include <xen/domain_page.h>
> +#include <xen/errno.h>

Is this really needed? Afaict it's included implicitly already.

> @@ -747,6 +751,133 @@ static void __init efi_relocate_esrt(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE 
> *SystemTable)
>      efi_bs->FreePool(memory_map);
>  }
> 
> +typedef struct {
> +    UINT16 signature;
> +    UINT32 file_size;
> +    UINT16 reserved[2];
> +    UINT32 data_offset;
> +} __attribute__((packed)) BMP_HEADER;

All capitals identifiers are by convention #define-s. bmp_header_t perhaps?

> +static __initdata struct {
> +    bool preserved;
> +    const void *old_addr;
> +    const void *new_addr;
> +    UINTN size;
> +    const char *failure_reason;
> +} bgrt_info = {
> +    /* We would prefer the failure_reason to print */
> +    .failure_reason = "",
> +};

I don't understand what the comment is supposed to be telling the reader.
Clearly it's not about the relocation subtlety which (imo) absolutely
needs commenting on.

> +static struct acpi_table_bgrt *__init efi_get_bgrt(void)
> +{
> +    const struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp;
> +    const struct acpi_table_xsdt *xsdt;
> +    UINTN entry_count;
> +    unsigned int i;
> +
> +    if ( efi.acpi20 == EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR )
> +        return NULL;
> +
> +    rsdp = (const void *)(UINTN)efi.acpi20;

Why the intermediate cast to UINTN?

> +    if ( !rsdp || !rsdp->xsdt_physical_address )
> +        return NULL;
> +
> +    xsdt = (const void *)rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;

What if only an RSDT is supplied?

> +    if ( memcmp(xsdt->header.signature, ACPI_SIG_XSDT, 4) != 0 )
> +        return NULL;
> +
> +    if ( xsdt->header.length < sizeof(xsdt->header) )
> +        return NULL;
> +    entry_count = (xsdt->header.length - sizeof(xsdt->header)) /
> +                  sizeof(xsdt->table_offset_entry[0]);
> +
> +    for ( i = 0; i < entry_count; i++ )

This calls for i and entry_count to have the same type.

> +    {
> +        const struct acpi_table_header *hdr;
> +
> +        hdr = (const void *)xsdt->table_offset_entry[i];
> +        if ( !hdr )
> +            continue;
> +
> +        if ( memcmp(hdr->signature, ACPI_SIG_BGRT, 4) == 0 &&
> +             hdr->length >= sizeof(struct acpi_table_bgrt) )
> +            return (struct acpi_table_bgrt *)hdr;

Please use container_of() in favor of casts.

> +    }
> +
> +    return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#define BMP_SIGNATURE 0x4D42
> +#define MAX_BGRT_IMAGE_SIZE (16 * 1024 * 1024)

Still an uncommented arbitrary constant.

> +static void __init efi_preserve_bgrt_img(void)
> +{
> +    struct acpi_table_bgrt *bgrt;
> +    const BMP_HEADER *bmp;
> +    const void *old_image;
> +    void *new_image;
> +    UINTN image_size;
> +    EFI_STATUS status;
> +    UINT8 checksum;
> +    unsigned int i;
> +
> +    bgrt_info.preserved = false;
> +
> +    bgrt = efi_get_bgrt();
> +    if ( !bgrt )
> +    {
> +        bgrt_info.failure_reason = "BGRT table not found";
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    if ( !bgrt->image_address )
> +        return;
> +
> +    old_image = (const void *)bgrt->image_address;
> +    bmp = old_image;
> +
> +    if ( bmp->signature != BMP_SIGNATURE )
> +    {
> +        bgrt_info.failure_reason = "Invalid BMP signature";
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    image_size = bmp->file_size;
> +    if ( !image_size || image_size > MAX_BGRT_IMAGE_SIZE )
> +    {
> +        bgrt_info.failure_reason = "Image size exceeds limit";

Does it, when it's zero?

> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Allocate memory of type EfiACPIReclaimMemory so that the image
> +     * will remain available for the OS after ExitBootServices().
> +     */
> +    status = efi_bs->AllocatePool(EfiACPIReclaimMemory, image_size, 
> &new_image);
> +    if ( EFI_ERROR(status) )
> +    {
> +        bgrt_info.failure_reason = "Memory allocation failed";
> +        return;
> +    }
> +    memcpy(new_image, old_image, image_size);
> +    bgrt->image_address = (UINTN)new_image;

This looks like the wrong cast to me, even if in practice this likely is
going to be fine even on 32-bit EFI.

> +    bgrt->header.checksum = 0;
> +    checksum = 0;
> +
> +    for ( i = 0; i < bgrt->header.length; i++ )
> +        checksum += ((const UINT8 *)bgrt)[i];
> +
> +    bgrt->header.checksum = -checksum;
> +
> +    /* Filling the debug struct for printing later */
> +    bgrt_info.preserved = true;
> +    bgrt_info.old_addr = old_image;
> +    bgrt_info.new_addr = new_image;
> +    bgrt_info.size = image_size;

I'd suggest to drop "debug" from the comment.

> --- a/xen/common/efi/common-stub.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/common-stub.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ unsigned long efi_get_time(void)
>  }
> 
>  void efi_reset_system(bool warm) { }
> +void __init efi_bgrt_status_info(void) { }

What is this? Does this belong into a later patch? And did you pay
attention to Marek's earlier comment (as to the use of __init)?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.