[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/mm: do not assign pages to a domain until they are scrubbed


  • To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:56:05 +0100
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:56:12 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 25.03.2026 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> ---
> I've attempted various different ways to solve this, but they all ended up
> being impossible.
> 
>  * Prevent non-scrubbed pages from getting extra refcounts (iow: make
>    get_page() fail for them).  This seemed nice, but the cleanup using
>    put_page_alloc_ref() was impossible as non-scrubbed pages would return
>    failure in get_page(), and so I couldn't take the extra reference ahead
>    of calling put_page_alloc_ref().

A special-case variant of get_page() could be introduced, but maybe that
would still be overly fragile.

When we discussed this, what I had proposed didn't require use of get_page()
though. assign_pages() would install two general references (plus one type
ref for PGT_writable) in this special case. To free, you'd call
put_page_alloc_ref() followed by put_page_and_type().

That said, the patch here is still less intrusive than I feared, so I'm not
asking to re-work this again.

>  * Disallow XENMEM_decrease_reservation until the domain has finished
>    creation would fix the issue of pages being freed while pending scrub,
>    but it's not clear there might be other usages that would be problematic,
>    as get_page() on non-scrubbed pages would still return success.

I agree this is of concern.

> --- a/xen/common/memory.c
> +++ b/xen/common/memory.c
> @@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ static void populate_physmap(struct memop_args *a)
>                              goto out;
>                          }
>                      }
> +
> +                    if ( assign_page(page, a->extent_order, d, memflags) )
> +                    {
> +                        free_domheap_pages(page, a->extent_order);

The pages don't have an owner set yet, so that function will go straight
to free_heap_pages(), needlessly passing "true" as last argument. Correct,
but (for large pages, which the stashing is about) highly inefficient.

> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2699,7 +2699,13 @@ struct page_info *alloc_domheap_pages(
>                                    memflags, d)) == NULL)) )
>           return NULL;
>  
> -    if ( d && !(memflags & MEMF_no_owner) )
> +    /*
> +     * Don't add pages with the PGC_need_scrub bit set to the domain, the
> +     * caller must clean the bit and then manually call assign_pages().
> +     * Otherwise pages with the PGC_need_scrub would be reachable using
> +     * get_page().
> +     */

How about replacing the latter "with the PGC_need_scrub" by "still subject
to scrubbing"?

> +    if ( d && !(memflags & MEMF_no_owner) && !(memflags & MEMF_keep_scrub) )
>      {
>          if ( memflags & MEMF_no_refcount )
>          {

This no-refcount code isn't repeated at the new call site of assign_page().
It's not needed there, yes, but wouldn't we better allow this to be taken
care of right here, moving the MEMF_keep_scrub check immediately ahead of
the call to assign_page()?

Otherwise should we reject (much earlier) MEMF_no_refcount used together
with MEMF_keep_scrub?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.