[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/pv: Provide better SYSCALL backwards compatibility in FRED mode


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:14:24 +0100
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 09:14:33 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 25.03.2026 18:02, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> In FRED mode, the SYSCALL instruction does not modify %rcx/%r11.  Software
> using SYSCALL spills %rcx/%r11 around the invocation, which is why FRED not
> doing this goes largely unnoticed.
> 
> However, consider the following migration scenario:
> 
>  * VM suspends.  Hypercall, so SYSCALL, %rcx/%r11 left unmodified
>  * VM moves to a non-FRED system
>  * Xen resumes the VM with a real SYSRET instruction
> 
> Instead of resuming at the instruction following the SYSCALL instruction, the
> VM is resumed at whatever dead value was in %rcx.

Would it? In restore_all_guest we load %r11 and %rcx from the stack
frame's EFLAGS and RIP fields. If we didn't, various other things wouldn't
work either.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -2405,6 +2405,8 @@ void asmlinkage entry_from_pv(struct cpu_user_regs 
> *regs)
>  
>              regs->ssx = l ? FLAT_KERNEL_SS   : FLAT_USER_SS32;
>              regs->csx = l ? FLAT_KERNEL_CS64 : FLAT_USER_CS32;
> +            regs->rcx = regs->rip;
> +            regs->r11 = regs->rflags;

Don't you also need to set TRAP_syscall here, for the new code in
eretu_exit_to_guest to actually make a difference? (There actually is
a paragraph about this in the comment out of context above, which then
may also want adjusting.)

Further a question as to limiting overhead: Doing this on every SYSCALL
entry ...

> @@ -26,7 +27,16 @@ FUNC(entry_FRED_R3, 4096)
>  END(entry_FRED_R3)
>  
>  FUNC(eretu_exit_to_guest)
> -        POP_GPRS
> +        /*
> +         * PV guests aren't aware of FRED.  If Xen in IDT mode would have 
> used
> +         * a SYSRET instruction, preserve the legacy behaviour for %rcx/%r11
> +         */
> +        testb   $TRAP_syscall >> 8, UREGS_entry_vector + 1(%rsp)
> +
> +        POP_GPRS /* Preserves flags */
> +
> +        cmovnz  EFRAME_rip(%rsp), %rcx
> +        cmovnz  EFRAME_eflags(%rsp), %r11

... and every exit-to-guest isn't very nice when concern is about just the
specific case of migrating FRED -> non-FRED. Couldn't we instead make the
adjustment when generating the save record for the register state of the
vCPU?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.