[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/uart: be more careful with changes to the PCI command register


  • To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 13:02:22 +0100
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 12:02:33 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 25.03.2026 15:58, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Read the existing PCI command register and only add the required bits to
> it, as to avoid clearing bits that might be possibly set by the firmware
> already.
> 
> This fixes serial output when booting with `com1=device=amt` on a system
> using an "Alder Lake AMT SOL Redirection" PCI device (Vendor ID 0x8086 and
> Device ID 0x51e3).  That device has both IO and memory decoding enabled by
> the firmware, and disabling memory decoding causes the serial to stop
> working (even when the serial register BAR is in the IO space).
> 
> Fixes: f2ff5d6628b3 ("ns16550: enable PCI serial card usage")
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not convinced Fixes: is appropriate here. There's nothing wrong with that
commit, aiui. What's bogus is the device behavior.

> --- a/xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c
> @@ -283,11 +283,17 @@ static int cf_check ns16550_getc(struct serial_port 
> *port, char *pc)
>  static void pci_serial_early_init(struct ns16550 *uart)
>  {
>  #ifdef NS16550_PCI
> +    uint16_t cmd = 0;
> +
> +    if ( uart->ps_bdf_enable )
> +        cmd = pci_conf_read16(PCI_SBDF(0, uart->ps_bdf[0], uart->ps_bdf[1],
> +                                       uart->ps_bdf[2]), PCI_COMMAND);

Why is this conditional? While fine for the use at the bottom, ...

>      if ( uart->bar && uart->io_base >= 0x10000 )
>      {
>          pci_conf_write16(PCI_SBDF(0, uart->ps_bdf[0], uart->ps_bdf[1],
>                                    uart->ps_bdf[2]),
> -                         PCI_COMMAND, PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
> +                         PCI_COMMAND, cmd | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY);
>          return;
>      }

... it looks wrong(ish) for this path. Actually, in ns16550_init_postirq()
we use

    if ( uart->bar || uart->ps_bdf_enable )

for example. With the new conditional updated accordingly:
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Jan

> @@ -307,7 +313,7 @@ static void pci_serial_early_init(struct ns16550 *uart)
>                       uart->io_base | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO);
>      pci_conf_write16(PCI_SBDF(0, uart->ps_bdf[0], uart->ps_bdf[1],
>                                uart->ps_bdf[2]),
> -                     PCI_COMMAND, PCI_COMMAND_IO);
> +                     PCI_COMMAND, cmd | PCI_COMMAND_IO);
>  #endif
>  }
>  




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.