[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3] arinc653: don't assume Dom0 is the control domain


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 14:57:04 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNH0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT7CwHkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPzsBNBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHfw==
  • Cc: Nathan Studer <nathan.studer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stewart Hildebrand <stewart@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 12:57:14 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 01.04.26 14:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
Leaving aside highly disaggregated environments, the control domain is
what will invoke XEN_SYSCTL_SCHEDOP_putinfo. Its vCPU-s therefore need to
be able to run unconditionally, not those of the domain with ID 0 (which
may not exist at all).

Fixes: 9f0c658baedc ("arinc: add cpu-pool support to scheduler")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
There being no "else" to the if(), what about other control domain vCPU-s?

I guess this is a stale leftover. Doesn't matter for committing anyway.

---
v3: Don't mistakenly include the idle domain.
v2: New.

--- a/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
+++ b/xen/common/sched/arinc653.c
@@ -411,10 +411,10 @@ a653sched_alloc_udata(const struct sched
      spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_priv->lock, flags);
/*
-     * Add every one of dom0's units to the schedule, as long as there are
-     * slots available.
+     * Add every one of the control domain's units to the schedule, as long as
+     * there are slots available.
       */
-    if ( unit->domain->domain_id == 0 )
+    if ( is_control_domain(unit->domain) && !is_idle_domain(unit->domain) )
      {
          entry = sched_priv->num_schedule_entries;

Hmm, is it really the control domain only which wants to be scheduled initially?
I would think that at least the hardware domain and probably a Xenstore domain
would want to be included, too.

In the end it might even be that other domains created via dom0less would want
to be able to run initially. They could be part of a mandatory infrastructure.
Why would they need to be created at boot if they are NOT important?

The question is whether the arinc653 scheduler is really meant for such setups.
OTOH just modifying the test to:

    if ( system_state < SYS_STATE_active &&
         unit->domain->domain_id < DOMID_FIRST_RESERVED )

seems to be fine for catching all those cases.

With or without this modification:

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.