|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 3/6] xen/arm: ffa: Tighten notification parameter validation
Hi Bertand,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 3:41 PM Bertrand Marquis
<bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The notification handlers still validate overlapping subsets of their
> inputs. BIND, UNBIND, and SET each decode caller and destination IDs
> locally, GET still accepts a non-zero receiver vCPU ID and reserved flag
> bits, and SET still accepts non-zero NS-virtual flags. BIND also treats
> unsupported non-zero flag encodings as a supported-feature failure
> instead of as malformed input.
>
> Add ffa_notif_parse_params() and use it to centralize the common
> caller/destination and non-zero bitmap checks for BIND, UNBIND, and SET.
> Also reject malformed GET and SET requests locally before touching
> cached state or forwarding anything to the SPMC. Keep BIND limited to
> global notifications and reject unsupported non-zero flag encodings with
> INVALID_PARAMETERS.
>
> - add a shared parameter parser for notification caller/destination
> validation
> - wire BIND and UNBIND through the shared parser and reject unsupported
> bind flag encodings with INVALID_PARAMETERS
> - reject non-zero receiver vCPU and reserved flag bits in
> FFA_NOTIFICATION_GET
> - reject non-zero flags in the NS-virtual FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET path
>
> Functional impact: malformed notification requests are rejected
> consistently earlier in the mediator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> index d15119409a25..491db3b04df5 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa_notif.c
> @@ -42,21 +42,40 @@ static void inject_notif_pending(struct domain *d)
> d);
> }
>
> +static int32_t ffa_notif_parse_params(uint16_t dom_id, uint16_t caller_id,
> + uint16_t dest_id, uint32_t bitmap_lo,
> + uint32_t bitmap_hi)
Nit: I would have picked ffa_notif_validate_params() or
ffa_notif_check_params(), but that might be more a matter of taste.
Anyway, looks good:
Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Jens
> +{
> + if ( caller_id != dom_id || dest_id == dom_id || !dest_id )
> + return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +
> + if ( !bitmap_lo && !bitmap_hi )
> + return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +
> + return FFA_RET_OK;
> +}
> +
> int32_t ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> {
> struct domain *d = current->domain;
> + struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee;
> + int32_t ret;
> uint32_t src_dst = get_user_reg(regs, 1);
> uint32_t flags = get_user_reg(regs, 2);
> uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
> uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
> + uint16_t caller_id = src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + uint16_t dest_id = src_dst >> 16;
>
> - if ( (src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0)) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
> + if ( flags ) /* Only global notifications are supported */
> return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>
> - if ( flags ) /* Only global notifications are supported */
> - return FFA_RET_DENIED;
> + ret = ffa_notif_parse_params(ctx->ffa_id, caller_id, dest_id, bitmap_lo,
> + bitmap_hi);
> + if ( ret )
> + return ret;
>
> - if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst >> 16) && fw_notif_enabled )
> + if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dest_id) && fw_notif_enabled )
> return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_BIND, src_dst, flags,
> bitmap_lo, bitmap_hi);
>
> @@ -66,16 +85,22 @@ int32_t ffa_handle_notification_bind(struct cpu_user_regs
> *regs)
> int32_t ffa_handle_notification_unbind(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> {
> struct domain *d = current->domain;
> + struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee;
> + int32_t ret;
> uint32_t src_dst = get_user_reg(regs, 1);
> uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
> uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
> + uint16_t caller_id = src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + uint16_t dest_id = src_dst >> 16;
>
> - if ( (src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0)) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
> - return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> + ret = ffa_notif_parse_params(ctx->ffa_id, caller_id, dest_id, bitmap_lo,
> + bitmap_hi);
> + if ( ret )
> + return ret;
>
> - if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst >> 16) && fw_notif_enabled )
> - return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0,
> bitmap_lo,
> - bitmap_hi);
> + if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dest_id) && fw_notif_enabled )
> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_UNBIND, src_dst, 0,
> bitmap_lo,
> + bitmap_hi);
>
> return FFA_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> }
> @@ -142,6 +167,12 @@ void ffa_handle_notification_get(struct cpu_user_regs
> *regs)
> return;
> }
>
> + if ( recv >> 16 || (flags & GENMASK(31, 4)) )
> + {
> + ffa_set_regs_error(regs, FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if ( fw_notif_enabled && (flags & ( FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SP |
> FFA_NOTIF_FLAG_BITMAP_SPM )) )
> {
> @@ -204,11 +235,19 @@ int32_t ffa_handle_notification_set(struct
> cpu_user_regs *regs)
> uint32_t flags = get_user_reg(regs, 2);
> uint32_t bitmap_lo = get_user_reg(regs, 3);
> uint32_t bitmap_hi = get_user_reg(regs, 4);
> + uint16_t caller_id = src_dst >> 16;
> + uint16_t dest_id = src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0);
> + int32_t ret;
> +
> + ret = ffa_notif_parse_params(ffa_get_vm_id(d), caller_id, dest_id,
> + bitmap_lo, bitmap_hi);
> + if ( ret )
> + return ret;
>
> - if ( (src_dst >> 16) != ffa_get_vm_id(d) )
> + if ( flags )
> return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
>
> - if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(src_dst & GENMASK(15, 0)) && fw_notif_enabled )
> + if ( FFA_ID_IS_SECURE(dest_id) && fw_notif_enabled )
> return ffa_simple_call(FFA_NOTIFICATION_SET, src_dst, flags,
> bitmap_lo,
> bitmap_hi);
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |