[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/5] vtd: Use pci_sbdf_t in acpi_parse_dev_scope()
- To: dmukhin@xxxxxxxx
- From: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:08:10 +0200
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=vates.tech header.i="@vates.tech" header.h="From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID"
- Autocrypt: addr=teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDNBGn5sK8BDACuzSrrTjpVf4ay06OYB6yY0J1PqKffihoNMtrQRZjAHxoAPC7LTBVHV/XO Zw5HJc+9R71z1JV+iYg6z3jPziGKzX8Fj3ZXlzJPmpf1PuETH3KdbvtJT4ny+OGntnJntUoR KRPhTirr6yNeBk/637O3CQXjtqFUPZnko8OI/o1yawIBhJJAWicutjkkUgd28Bh6HV9EIumH tCBgn5/1A/fpm9624MMgYLsA8qjC4XsoovQvFCaO8HEhvfzrrTZHjn/nPeB9SigxIxXW8YaT VqMdqul07o72m3eA2mf+LMu9a04FX/d4wbxBLtELm+1jIrbtyaFZEMOLv/haSiS/Lj3btJH/ EoucejoZ5SH49ksmVAmKOLktOaTQ8b2gEvP7iaKiIiszCCtOSRohr+2GvDsDeLvVZnlR3I+S PhHar7TPKjFz0G3DPNolyjXywNqOAMpomSPi8lSwjAFsxOtQbcck/qRGRSNk4DAmH70pA+89 MXfQXZ3qt1Q01B1+sU0I8xsAEQEAAc0kVGVkZHkgQXN0aWUgPHRlZGR5LmFzdGllQHZhdGVz LnRlY2g+wsENBBMBCAA3FiEEGAIew9LzHY3pdrqtZg+p0QLLz9AFAmn5sK8FCQWjmoACGwME CwkIBwUVCAkKCwUWAgMBAAAKCRBmD6nRAsvP0ID6DACGOktArFbLKHNzuyOVCskwfUZPla6Z pd3GZ8r61SrAKePIr2BnpgPkd0hV3bSRkRLIrgjzR2NRCzfp0x0HfuhcYfAYPR46XHTvjaJE v99sT/vGUG1BZguYDOScSEpgSNaNlYum3RKZbMuROxdK8G+YHccJY8PvWSq2K2yiae2KGiAv 1yjnZxug9/PtDfX8vQFUSg2w1ukRDf50wvDohN1zUQfFtofOP2xCRsDZiHAlQ0pF+aUjXQhP eP3IdpfWc8cyRLXF06Rk46YMYCytweGtGdHcqAfrVthl84129ZPN422k/voW0sm14gjYlGcT UwgnYlFRk2FLq0QeKEDcS0aj3o3EVAQCrayoGzi1pnlIKE3PRGUcUzjGVvzQ/po24gOjwba9 Egr/Wmu3MQlx/7A8zT5QBzF/n+RYdLNQ0Eu6YnUwf0Z1uieqNaon+olyIRFiLb/hCZHO6ekN f5vrm2clHUbQAYaPQebknujoKBo6ZLHg0WM1gZS01Gz+aUpKsUfOwM0EafmwsAEMAKiQiZa3 yQMmc/h3sDbfVHPSiBA4IMI/NAB7IotzPHq1GzCpsoVILAhF/INbWjxJ3DbVf+en3/FvdVZg 2S38xtnth0njNdlVKpyxm054phKjbdoFDwaknWolS4hrddTmetSG5/52AjtmPFtlXAk0NmLv fJnW3seXVQbgM7sW/MNXPP5UKDpkGnLhnvej+GU0s3109sJeXT5ImVdphFs9cvyZyBT9t1Pb Rowv58EgV0zE4hbAeVkULAbxFV5b/ExTjjGVHoX7CVhWxvCiTqCUoXZRkUE9C3FnkzEFRkKb Yu6NCfiHfEyB3Xyg9hfdrRgjMRq907zCof+nDtWxGz1MSEuvTj1g9GZ049Bennqzjc/Q+0ov XoK4jm+Py0FiUGUaA6yhexficjH+kCR/xDbVnWrMhSLB4AuTBT9HjfZI6gk3uYLhoT8Pig4/ eVtR2Q1wZIJsFToR6ofGuyECwFcs+PUXN7fmGRSiPXgjAr/zIUBdW0VWCE3OGPNqtRk2E5s6 IQARAQABwsD8BBgBCAAmFiEEGAIew9LzHY3pdrqtZg+p0QLLz9AFAmn5sLAFCQWjmoACGwwA CgkQZg+p0QLLz9DncQwAg76IehTemLIfrB8T9WIBZrI4kUV7G7a4rjiVoUiHYN5QwhnbZnsa JDlt+Ezoqy/510eo2bCSzvW5xXYPgyjcuOPwgQo1Qp764QxyX6rld2f2RcWkDuBHun55ZWXj by8o21ginPRwruBVYY5rVf3DV1iBu4NurUeHtyFk/dS0XTOQi2wVUb17sW/+ybCEokdVacZG zOqP/OmwHrF8ylXlXnhQq6e3r+J+T8fuoGJelm/CJiMwyP6cEWE8sxVqX/iqwjwUYkuOCpE+ lOWSvdNHgoEkWR0RXBPQjnGmLKbfTl/QDXLk6NP2/r9uxm2HL6Ei3QJKSEdrp+XZaVnk/Off O485NOTKwGOxyWb006cTMh53xPkAJFQu4Tvdj+odsHz88jqw5wfPG0BYWx0I/FspYj7N9kZR 8ULR9nX0LvpzJ/kB4NgHIUt8YtIL6ZSfM2dbF7fKzvx1UqFfvozJZwFzfEieJLXa4nlGgR6D x9fhaZEsniw8/bYgC3igkk5YJiOa
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:08:28 +0000
- Feedback-id: default:8631fc262581453bbf619ec5b2062170:Sweego
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Le 20/05/2026 à 05:03, dmukhin@xxxxxxxx a écrit :
On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 05:21:26PM +0200, Teddy Astie wrote:
Use a dedicated pci_sbdf_t struct that we update instead of recreating
one each time we need it.
Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 42 ++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
index 2a756831a6..c36f4bbd7b 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
{
struct acpi_ioapic_unit *acpi_ioapic_unit;
const struct acpi_dmar_device_scope *acpi_scope;
- u16 bus, sub_bus, sec_bus;
+ u16 sub_bus, sec_bus;
const struct acpi_dmar_pci_path *path;
struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd = type == DMAR_TYPE ?
container_of(scope, struct acpi_drhd_unit, scope) : NULL;
@@ -332,29 +332,26 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
while ( start < end )
{
+ pci_sbdf_t dev_sbdf;
acpi_scope = start;
path = (const void *)(acpi_scope + 1);
depth = (acpi_scope->length - sizeof(*acpi_scope)) / sizeof(*path);
- bus = acpi_scope->bus;
+ dev_sbdf = PCI_SBDF(seg, acpi_scope->bus, path->dev, path->fn);
`dev_sbdf` calculation depends on `path` which is updated in `while()` loop
below.
Ah yes indeed, good catch.
Fixed locally.
while ( --depth > 0 )
{
- bus = pci_conf_read8(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn),
- PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
+ dev_sbdf.bus = pci_conf_read8(dev_sbdf, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
path++;
}
switch ( acpi_scope->entry_type )
{
case ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_BRIDGE:
- sec_bus = pci_conf_read8(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn),
- PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
- sub_bus = pci_conf_read8(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn),
- PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS);
+ sec_bus = pci_conf_read8(dev_sbdf, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
+ sub_bus = pci_conf_read8(dev_sbdf, PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS);
if ( iommu_verbose )
printk(VTDPREFIX " bridge: %pp start=%x sec=%x sub=%x\n",
- &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn),
- acpi_scope->bus, sec_bus, sub_bus);
+ &dev_sbdf, acpi_scope->bus, sec_bus, sub_bus);
dmar_scope_add_buses(scope, sec_bus, sub_bus);
gfx_only = false;
@@ -362,8 +359,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
case ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_HPET:
if ( iommu_verbose )
- printk(VTDPREFIX " MSI HPET: %pp\n",
- &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn));
+ printk(VTDPREFIX " MSI HPET: %pp\n", &dev_sbdf);
if ( drhd )
{
@@ -374,9 +370,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
if ( !acpi_hpet_unit )
goto out;
acpi_hpet_unit->id = acpi_scope->enumeration_id;
- acpi_hpet_unit->bus = bus;
- acpi_hpet_unit->dev = path->dev;
- acpi_hpet_unit->func = path->fn;
+ acpi_hpet_unit->bdf = dev_sbdf.bdf;
list_add(&acpi_hpet_unit->list, &drhd->hpet_list);
gfx_only = false;
@@ -386,16 +380,15 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
case ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_ENDPOINT:
if ( iommu_verbose )
- printk(VTDPREFIX " endpoint: %pp\n",
- &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn));
+ printk(VTDPREFIX " endpoint: %pp\n", &dev_sbdf);
- if ( drhd && pci_device_detect(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn) )
+ if ( drhd && pci_device_detect(seg, dev_sbdf.bus, dev_sbdf.dev,
dev_sbdf.fn) )
Looks like `pci_device_detect()` also needs some refactoring...
(Probably out of scope for this series, though)
{
- if ( pci_conf_read8(PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn),
+ if ( pci_conf_read8(dev_sbdf,
PCI_CLASS_DEVICE + 1) != 0x03
/* PCI_BASE_CLASS_DISPLAY */ )
gfx_only = false;
- else if ( !seg && !bus && path->dev == 2 && !path->fn )
+ else if ( !seg && !dev_sbdf.bus && path->dev == 2 && !path->fn
)
igd_drhd_address = drhd->address;
}
@@ -403,8 +396,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
case ACPI_DMAR_SCOPE_TYPE_IOAPIC:
if ( iommu_verbose )
- printk(VTDPREFIX " IOAPIC: %pp\n",
- &PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, path->dev, path->fn));
+ printk(VTDPREFIX " IOAPIC: %pp\n", &dev_sbdf);
if ( drhd )
{
@@ -413,9 +405,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
if ( !acpi_ioapic_unit )
goto out;
acpi_ioapic_unit->apic_id = acpi_scope->enumeration_id;
- acpi_ioapic_unit->ioapic.bdf.bus = bus;
- acpi_ioapic_unit->ioapic.bdf.dev = path->dev;
- acpi_ioapic_unit->ioapic.bdf.func = path->fn;
+ acpi_ioapic_unit->ioapic.info = dev_sbdf.bdf;
list_add(&acpi_ioapic_unit->list, &drhd->ioapic_list);
gfx_only = false;
@@ -431,7 +421,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_dev_scope(
gfx_only = false;
continue;
}
- scope->devices[didx++] = PCI_BDF(bus, path->dev, path->fn);
+ scope->devices[didx++] = dev_sbdf.bdf;
start += acpi_scope->length;
}
--
2.52.0
--
Teddy Astie | Vates XCP-ng Developer
XCP-ng & Xen Orchestra - Vates solutions
web: https://vates.tech
Teddy
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x660FA9D102CBCFD0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|