[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/mm: Normalize X86 per-domain page counters to unsigned long


  • To: Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:50:49 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Jun 2026 12:50:50 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 29.05.2026 14:43, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
> Prepare x86 for >16 TiB domains by normalizing the per-domain page counts
> in paging_domain (total_pages, free_pages, p2m_pages) to unsigned long
> and widen page counts in related x86 allocation functions accordingly:
> 
> - paging_domain.{total,free,p2m}_pages: unsigned int -> unsigned long
> - x86/mm/shadow/common.c:
>   - unsigned long sh_min_allocation(d)
>   - unsigned long shadow_min_acceptable_pages(d)
>   - unsigned long shadow_get_allocation(d)
>   - shadow_set_allocation(unsigned long pages)
>   - shadow_enable(): fix narrowing from d->arch.paging.total_pages to
>     unsigned int
> - x86/mm/hap/hap.c:
>   - unsigned long hap_get_allocation(d)
>   - hap_set_allocation(unsigned long pages)
>   - hap_enable(): fix narrowing from d->arch.paging.total_pages to
>     unsigned int
> - x86/mm/paging.c:
>   - paging_set_allocation(unsigned long pages)
>   - arch_set_paging_mempool_size() don't truncate pages
> 
> Note: pages in _shadow_prealloc(), shadow_alloc(), shadow_free() and
> shadow_prealloc() is intentionally kept as unsigned int.  It carries
> the per-shadow-entry page count from shadow_size() (uint8_t-backed,
> max 4), not the pool allocation count.
> 
> Note: xen_domctl_shadow_op.mb stays uint32_t, and the domctl ABI remains
> MB-based and caps at 4 PiB, replacing the 16 TiB per-domain limit.
> Casts widen the mb-to-pages arithmetic to unsigned long where needed.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

I don't think I suggested this, and yet more than for parts of the earlier
patch I wonder if this isn't going too far, at least right now. Certainly
a 32 TiB guest (i.e. one having 64G pages assigned) isn't going to need a
P2M pool of more than 4G pages. As per code you alter in patch 1 and here,
the internal ratio is rather 256, i.e. the widening would be needed when
we meant to have guests of about 256 TiB size.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.