[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-4.22 4/5] tests/numa: add unit tests for NUMA setup logic


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 16:07:19 +0200
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=CKr6ru4MsD0YxQZPKp1WKVyPj7BVm0CrpkmzwdT7r94=; b=Fw3XOrdKm34uw+MQ8Zi87wMwBlj75y8S2CvZ+GT9cupXzE7Xvyq3TiBboh9pPXe88TzdpqXOjVWcXvoWjLSQsApG3chKz5239LOaZN9C7GQZF7KZUCVIshSxDnHK9DpzOIwklle2k4GZsCR8skZea8LGulsZgd0jNS4eHx4mv2yX5SWr4SEJaffx/4cNc0UqKYtLFpUVw16h+tG5ZsIKjU4yqtsx7pujeZGl2L7AluZ+8dcOucDL7/+OSPrSdWQtSkVMm0sUdS6v3Y3rfmkMYXrzZoAv+FdnvhrHqPobnq2ORPb8LbYRmTUFZhltPfStxVVJnPOTfEyiIutKQm7PmA==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=rX+W1x+sb9j9PLI0qUyORYarnSDFrKXVNVLHUHuPOAljcUx/uFo8mBOnCwI6+zSl234XJupSK2AKi8lb4h3CDit89f/0rjMevQx1ScSVK4+ycmF6P0whafIWC30b0WR65eQj0nx3h7NboYpk7qeBKktk51ftJEH7rhTBbNxkptn8bDprfQE0vVCBlHTZeYMh5bMn0c2RreXpNs1/13RzS1suGcc+/sdEEGd2sNjryLT4VJWDZ/8B7h5IDXGhAfSWtmXvUM7bdp1Epr8lSHH0YS1X3l2AiY3juuY4RFBv6Ogd84s0zsJMENH9/69TOxYVEApbZTBwlMW6sB1Jh15FLg==
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=citrix.com header.i="@citrix.com" header.h="From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck"
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
  • Cc: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:07:37 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 03.06.2026 15:45, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 10:38:52AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 01.06.2026 17:43, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/tools/tests/numa/.gitignore
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >>> +/numa.h
> >>> +/test-numa
> >>
> >> Why the leading slashes?
> > 
> > This is the format of the .gitignore that we use in the pdx, numa and
> > rengeset testing.  The slashes denote that the pattern is relative to
> > the particular .gitignore itself, but won't match any level below the
> > .gitignore.
> 
> Hmm, before replying I checked a few other .gitignore files under tests/,
> and none had leading slashes. For the purposes here either way is likely
> fine, but really we'd better be consistent overall. (Which isn't a request
> for you to change or do anything, merely a remark.)

% cat tools/tests/*/.gitignore
test-cpu-policy
generated
test-domid
test-mem-claim
/numa.h
/test-numa
test-paging-mempool
/pdx.h
/test-pdx-mask
/test-pdx-offset
/list.h
/rangeset.c
/rangeset.h
/test-rangeset
test-resource
test-tsx
test-xenstore

Some have, some doesn't.  Using the slash is IMO more accurate
matching, but I'm not going to adjust the others either unless I have
to modify them for other reasons possibly.

Thanks, Roger.



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.