[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 17/23] xen/riscv: create APLIC DT node for guest domains
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:44:18 +0200
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=20251104 header.d=gmail.com header.i="@gmail.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
- Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:44:37 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 6/22/26 5:23 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.2026 13:17, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic.c
@@ -12,8 +12,10 @@
#include <xen/const.h>
#include <xen/device_tree.h>
#include <xen/errno.h>
+#include <xen/fdt-kernel.h>
#include <xen/init.h>
#include <xen/irq.h>
+#include <xen/libfdt/libfdt.h>
#include <xen/mm.h>
#include <xen/sections.h>
#include <xen/spinlock.h>
Why's this needed all of the sudden?
It isn't, just missed with vaplic.c, the similar name... I will drop
these changes from aplic.c.
@@ -29,6 +36,74 @@ static void cf_check vaplic_deinit(struct vcpu *v)
return vcpu_imsic_deinit(v);
}
+static int __init cf_check vaplic_make_domu_dt_node(struct kernel_info *kinfo)
+{
+ struct domain *d = kinfo->bd.d;
+ int res = 0;
+ void *fdt = kinfo->fdt;
+ unsigned int msi_parent_phandle;
+ char vaplic_name[128];
Again an excessively large array?
Yes, i will change to 32. It will be enough.
+static const struct vintc_init_ops __initdata init_ops = {
Like elsewhere, __initconst{,rel} with const.
+ .make_domu_dt_node = vaplic_make_domu_dt_node,
+};
+
static const struct vintc_ops vintc_ops = {
.vcpu_init = vaplic_init,
.vcpu_deinit = vaplic_deinit,
@@ -43,6 +118,7 @@ int domain_vaplic_init(struct domain *d)
d->arch.vintc = &vaplic->vintc;
d->arch.vintc->ops = &vintc_ops;
+ d->arch.vintc->init_ops = &init_ops;
The caller of ->init_ops->make_domu_dt_node() appeared in patch 11 already,
if I'm getting things right. That is, up here there's a NULL deref there.
Yes, but make_intc_domU_node() (and therefore
->init_ops->make_domu_dt_node()) is only called from create_domUs(),
which is not invoked in this patch series.
Thanks.
~ Oleksii
|