[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 17/23] xen/riscv: create APLIC DT node for guest domains
- To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:08:01 +0200
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:08:26 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 20.07.2026 17:59, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/aplic-priv.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/aplic-priv.h
> @@ -34,4 +34,18 @@ struct aplic_priv {
> const struct imsic_config *imsic_cfg;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Value is inspired by what QEMU is using for riscv,num-sources property for
> + * APLIC node.
> + */
> +#define GUEST_APLIC_MAX_SOURCES 96U
> +
> +/*
> + * Specifies the number of wired interrupt sources supported by guest APLIC
> + * domain.
> + * Could be limited by host interrupt controller and is identical for every
> + * domain.
> + */
> +extern unsigned int guest_aplic_num_sources;
It being only IMSIC which is supported right now together with APLIC, what
exactly does the word "wired" mean to express in the comment? MSI, as their
name says, aren't "wired interrupts" but messages on the system bus.
You may also want to add "for now" to the latter sentence.
> @@ -29,6 +37,74 @@ static void cf_check vaplic_deinit(struct vcpu *v)
> return vcpu_imsic_deinit(v);
> }
>
> +static int __init cf_check vaplic_make_domu_dt_node(struct kernel_info
> *kinfo)
> +{
> + struct domain *d = kinfo->bd.d;
> + int res;
> + void *fdt = kinfo->fdt;
> + unsigned int msi_parent_phandle;
> + char vaplic_name[32];
> + unsigned int aplic_size = APLIC_SIZE(d->max_vcpus);
> + const __be32 reg[] = {
> + cpu_to_be32(GUEST_APLIC_S_BASE >> 32),
> + cpu_to_be32(GUEST_APLIC_S_BASE),
> + cpu_to_be32(0),
> + cpu_to_be32(aplic_size),
> + };
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(APLIC_SIZE(MAX_VIRT_CPUS) > UINT_MAX);
> +
> + res = snprintf(vaplic_name, sizeof(vaplic_name), "/soc/aplic@%lx",
Well, what should I say? I really expected you to have gone through all of your
pending patches. replacing sizeof() by ARRAY_SIZE() in cases like this one.
With this adjusted and with the question above sorted one way or the other:
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Jan
|