RE: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain

["Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > >  If that's true, there wouldn't be SMP for domains, since 
> they are 
> > > assossiated with only one VPU.
> > 
> > I thought SMP support for guests was still not functional. AFAIK, 
> > domains are still pinned to a single CPU. Am I wrong?
> You are correct. Btw, VPU is a term you just made up, so 
> don't read too much into it.

This is untrue for the unstable/3.0 tree: SMP guests are true SMP.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users