[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX Hardware


  • To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Shane O'Donnell \(shodonne\)" <shodonne@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:44:13 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:10:38 +0000
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcWg/ky2WFo/+SeIRIew9m9j7NiKWgCbUZ2Q
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX Hardware

I hope you aren't in a hurry to do your benchmarking on AMD's Nested
Page Tables since their initial launch of Pacifica won't include this
support.

This info came from an AMD "fellow" (sorry--names have eluded
me--"Richard Brunner" seems right) at the Xen BoF @ Linux World (8/10)
who indicated that this functionality will be added in later.  This was
the same BoF where Intel demonstrated Win XP running natively on Xen on
a development VT platform -- good stuff.

Disclaimer: Intel also noted at the same meeting that their ultimate for
roadmap for VT (the new name for Vanderpool) will also be delivered in
staged releases.

Shane O. 

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 2:23 PM
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: Goetz Bock; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; monz@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] VMX Hardware


On 14 Aug 2005, at 19:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> The Pacifica spec does mention optional hardware support for "Nested 
> Page Tables" which is essentially hardware shadow page tables.
>
> Should be interesting to see the performance difference between 
> software/hardware shadow page tables.

I have doubts about the performance of hardware page tables, unless
there's a clever TLB design. A pagetable walk which is four memory
accesses on normal x86/64 becomes twenty accesses in nested mode!

It may be that shadow pagetables, by providing a bigger 'cache' for 
guest->host mappings, can actually perform better on many workloads.

I guess we'll see -- if silicon is produced that supports that mode,
someone is bound to add support to Xen.

  -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.