Re: [Xen-users] Is there a working FC4/multiple NIC recipe?

[Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Marcus Brown wrote:

> Hi,
> Perhaps I've missed something. I believe multiple physical NICs and
> multiple bridges both work correctly (using 2.0.7 from source, anyway)
Yes, I was referring strictly to unstable.

thanks,
Nivedita


> eg. My Firewall config contains (overkill)
> pci = ['00,0b,0', '00,0a,0' ]
> nics=11
> vif = [ 'mac=aa:00:00:00:22:01, bridge=br10', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:01, bridge=xen-br0', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:09, bridge=br1', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:17, bridge=br2', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:25, bridge=br3', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:33, bridge=br4', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:49, bridge=br5', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:45, bridge=br6', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:73, bridge=br7', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:81, bridge=br8', \
>         'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:97, bridge=br9' ]
>
> So that's 2 REAL nics and 11 virtual for the Firewall.
>
> Marcus.
>
> Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
>
> > master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I've been usings Rik's experimental 1454 RPMs and they work fine with the
> > > exception of multiple NICs in domU and some spurious 'xm list' errors.
> > >
> > > Is there a known working combination that supports FC4 dom0/domU and
> > > multiple NICs in the domU? Right now, domU crashes when more than one NIC
> > > is specified -- apparently a known bug.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to build a domU firewall and that will require at least two
> > > physical NICs in the domU. I also plan on building a snort monitoring box
> > > in their somewhere as well.
> >
> > Did you really mean physical nics in domU? That isn't
> > yet supported at the moment for pci devices. The multiple
> > virtual nics problem should be fixed fairly soon...
> >
> > thanks,
> > Nivedita


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users