Re: [Xen-users] Is there a working FC4/multiple NIC recipe?

[Marcus Brown <marcusbrutus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
Perhaps I've missed something. I believe multiple physical NICs and
multiple bridges both work correctly (using 2.0.7 from source, anyway)

eg. My Firewall config contains (overkill)
pci = ['00,0b,0', '00,0a,0' ]
nics=11
vif = [ 'mac=aa:00:00:00:22:01, bridge=br10', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:01, bridge=xen-br0', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:09, bridge=br1', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:17, bridge=br2', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:25, bridge=br3', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:33, bridge=br4', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:49, bridge=br5', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:45, bridge=br6', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:73, bridge=br7', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:81, bridge=br8', \
        'mac=aa:00:00:25:40:97, bridge=br9' ]

So that's 2 REAL nics and 11 virtual for the Firewall.

Marcus.

Nivedita Singhvi wrote:
> master@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>> I've been usings Rik's experimental 1454 RPMs and they work fine with the
>> exception of multiple NICs in domU and some spurious 'xm list' errors.
>>
>> Is there a known working combination that supports FC4 dom0/domU and
>> multiple NICs in the domU? Right now, domU crashes when more than one NIC
>> is specified -- apparently a known bug.
>>
>> I'm trying to build a domU firewall and that will require at least two
>> physical NICs in the domU. I also plan on building a snort monitoring box
>> in their somewhere as well.
> 
> 
> Did you really mean physical nics in domU? That isn't
> yet supported at the moment for pci devices. The multiple
> virtual nics problem should be fixed fairly soon...
> 
> thanks,
> Nivedita

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users