[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] slow read IO in domU
- To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: <desire@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:59:36 +0800
- Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:06:43 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=B3YhQMGpkHfDSlQj/7GUBTzGz7L8rBxddisqTUzjrUZq29ILfgkIKyPQaF4JcFNUQJt0a53e2c+RXqX9aGK+nS+f8KyVMJXlKlVqUHaoOJSeR2V2R4PsNJXlyQ1wFF/WYMSwbuibD1Ce/XR64VqGqIKu2f+G+FRl1IqEAigVf+s=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Sorry for the duplicate mail... gmail had some problems...
On 1/14/06, desire@xxxxxxxxx <
desire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi, I think I must've done something incorrectly, but I can't quite figure out what it is.
To compare disk I/O performance in dom0 and domU, I ran the following
two dd lines and observed vmstat 1 results (for blocks read/written per
second), dd's reported speed, etc. both dom0 and domU are
allocated 512MB of RAM, so reading the 1GB file should not benefit from
caching.
dd bs=1000000 count=1000 if=/dev/zero of=junk
(sync, wait, etc)
dd bs=1000000 count=1000 of=/dev/zero if=junk
In dom0, I achieve 45MB/s write speed and 63MB/s read speed reasonably
consistently. I guess this should be reasonable speeds for a
partition on LVM on linux software raid 0 on a pair of SATA drives near
the front of the disk. This speed was observed using dd output as
well as dom0 vmstat.
In domU, I achieve also about 45MB/s write speed but only about 13MB/s
read speed consistently, while writing to a "sda3" residing on a
dedicated LVM volume on software raid 0 on the same part of
disks. This speed was observed in vmstat on both dom0 and domU.
This is on xen 2.0.6 with linux 2.6.9 dom0 and domU kernels.
Shouldn't dom0 and domU achieve similar read & write speeds? Thanks
for any pointers as to where I've gone wrong...
I've now noticed that I get different results running the same tests on
my domU's sda1 (ext3 on a dom0 loopback file residing on a
reiserfs-formatted LVM volume on software raid device) and sda3
(reiserfs on a dom0 LVM volume on software raid device). Although
sda1 should intuitively be slower since it goes through an additional
loopback file, I achieved closer read/write speeds to dom0 (~ 42/40
read/write MB/s), while sda3 is noticeably slower at reading (~ 13/45
read/write MB/s).
Is this difference in speed likely to be caused by loopback file on LVM
vs. direct LVM, or perhaps by ext3 vs reiserfs, or something else?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
