[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation


  • To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:22:38 +0530
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David H <davidh.davidh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:00:00 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PQYxG59uMQ+B/msbdCerLcr8BfyO+hgzKvgwWl63UC9RTUqtvLJpbDm56qOkkPX8re13OiufYtrXI3VRiCGhGsGMo1BA2REbfWNNvLK5hpmAF/+DoYth27MaiZKPUvG1KKYtfNY+y5um78lf+3n6UfujyV3/JG27B8LLcXC8fGA=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 1/16/06, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> base volume shared between domU's ?
> correct me if i am wrong but doesn't that imply a cow like system ?

It does.

> Can you explain this please ?

In my current (experimental) setup I'm using unionfs.

Could i ask for a howto / link where i can know more about how to try the same setup ?

--

regards,

Anand
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.