[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation


  • To: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:59:33 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:21:11 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ftF0IyBbsIMxqeJz/ooYOBMVfI2v2hj535xz5UT4KueJUHVoK+eY572Y+Iq+5GGLAOAilvTWlOrDtpFZBiLqI0DoAYf6fiAclwm92P2f+o7fRN8caRbosUXTkLTRELbPTcQevNi2j0xUY8ZuZx+cVnyGo5/j92HJXf13/HztCnQ=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Anand wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.

np.

> And for the filesystem are you using flat images or volumes ?

A base volume shared between domU's and an image on top with per-domU files.
Going to drop the images and switch to volumes I think, since I don't
like the maximum of 8 virtual machines that this feature imposes.  Too
bad, cause I did like the sparseness that the images allowed for ;-).

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.