[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation
- To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:15:52 +0530
- Cc: Charles Duffy <cduffy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:52:22 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZSIQWf/ApBR65qFPCfF+iyMN9PvqKOFmrCvP+t6dgt0P48xmXSxvf8Q2Ri+hC9sJ2ddOHRBTBPQGsFOx8sfsP+OYqXhGJKuU1f+VU09Exs5yEIzjGJ1VdC/Y/L2uTt2la1kYl8EN7EY6gNyqB1y3iDGiulkC84LM65wrQJ4rouY=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On 1/10/06, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gah.
I've used it a lot with SLAX where it seemed stable, and I've just got
Xen up and running with it. So I'm going to try it out anyway. Can't
get any worse than LVM snapshots, so I'm hopeful. I'll probably be
back here in a month, regretting :-).
Can you share your experience of lvm snapshots ? I was thinking about using them. What problems did you face ?
Thanks for your time.
--
regards,
Anand
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
