[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] routed networking xen3.0.1


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:58:43 +0530
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:39:43 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=FLyKBZ9G5XLMPcq+IpDFKR7bwJELgSpogh7XVh0gJdCpCzfeGymCNGxM5coS1lroqWxxfeddHG9t50wE5VBVSGDhwoUo9c/hteoPprpRqrlx/NKrKW4MT4xSvDaDUEvqbTEK18DdoJdPZ+XsCwGtQuyunfFSs8eT0L6iiu8O3zY=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Shouldn't the vif-route be adding the route in dom0?

On 2/6/06, Anand Gupta <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/6/06, CJ van den Berg < cj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The route output in dom0 would complete the picture.

Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
192.168.1.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0          255.255.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0
0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0


--
regards,

Anand Gupta
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.