[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] The linux-2.6-xen hg kernel is oopsing on xen-unstable change set 3.0.0_8819


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andy Repton <xen@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:05:29 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:17:47 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eQ9tcvML0KevbLXKHu4wvLHb5HfrG3aoG1D1Vw7Wtpn+f7DDSjr1gNB89Rtg9PUs041xj13foIwNLqAntNO5bCvokR0S3+qi63TKtBbWhrppD4c7aoY6svYNFu2GuywKd/gaRxmIntbtDY2/YnJuaDFBUAgmBE+tkwkOYuU/Pso=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,

I'm trying to find a stable xen/kernel combination that doesn't
require me to stick with 2.6.12.

I've compiled the linux-2.6.16-xen tree from mercurial and it
initially appeared fine. I assumed that this kernel is intended to be
run with the xen-unstable tree, so I also compiled and installed the
unstable mercurial tree at changeset 8819.

On torture testing the setup (transferring the kernel tree via scp,
looped access to a lighttpd) I'm getting oops' in the domUs.

I have the oops dumps, so I'm looking for the best way forward: are
they of use to the xen guys?

Should the hg kernel tree work ok with 3.0.0 unstable?

Andy

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.