[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Is my xen-friendly glibc really faster?

  • To: "Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:28:11 +1300
  • Cc: Ernst Bachmann <e.bachmann@xxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:28:44 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bYJI1sA1Bzb9uIo31qxrgg2k7mY6XXx5lidSQz8rkqDsNHlGYo9bPTG055bpSzbRDKlDQMAtyf/aoDiMsnCTEjFC5ytKn9oVI75fL5K+pFHEJ23DDie8oM2VVKktnq2Oi9GxTsZ50fC2TqnGSE93RTU/yBaQPmN9S7X5TOkuYHc=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 26/02/06, Chris Fanning <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> > Moving the home dir to dom0 or native lvm device mount made that
> > problem go away.
> What do you mean by 'native'?

ie. mounting the lvm slice from the host0 direct using disks = [...].

> I've done all my testing on xen3 so it seems you need not test this yet ;)

Interesting as the network performance in Xen 3.0 between domUs does
seem better, at least for scp.  I guess there is still latency issues.

Nicholas Lee
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.