[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Does VT have any benefits for paravirtualization?

  • To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Alexander Dubinin" <adubinin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 18:24:01 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:24:35 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lhteQhdHlXfu46Y4uS8s314ZYjrgPUleSZJwRNwcnmIEtl5e3wcjRYGZOsZ9Pub32z6CLDlMI3hWvqfQnDW810y3HmL40feGAPDPgLp6XZ2vsZ67hRXJXSU7o/vsXPK4bKLbhwWTigvtRggjVAdZN4Oz8SKzxdK+VEGAhDBllLg=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi all,

Seems like currently VT is used to provide full virtualizaton, but may
it help somehow for increasing modified OS performance?

As far as I understand, it may improve CPU sharing even for
para-virtualization, isn't it?

--
Regards,
  Alexander Dubinin

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.