[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Bridge vs. Route configuration?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: NAHieu <nahieu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 04:02:09 +0900
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:02:51 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=IBfzVirCWkfYFySEJLvsMF6ruJadYtODeIYcs//XLiT+pa5YCiBWVST6w8NjiC/PUNbfwSbHdindFjHFji5BSanBhKKnas4x97BrjpOsvG/yizrU6BxYKFqgenPdJrD+LNuSEfTFvq/VHqVKgkfbzxc9kKGnAf8Kd+Ppu0/WA8M=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,

In Xen, by default the domains are configured to use bridge (with
network-bridge script). But there is network-route, and this option
also allows us to connect domains.

But I don't see what is the advantage of Route config over Bridge. In
which case we should use Route method instead?

Thanks.
H

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.